RE: AW: [ebxml-dev] RE: [EDI-L] Article on ebXML Core Components ...

[Rachel Foerster <rachelf@ix.netcom.com>]

Bob,

Yes, but....but to first send a PO out of QuickBooks (and Quicken doesn't
even understand the concept...only invoices and payments!) you must first
print the document to a .pdf file...then you can attach it to an email.

This is the method I've been using for many years with my clients....but it
still takes a bit of fooling around!

Rachel

-----Original Message-----
From: bhaugen [mailto:linkage@interaccess.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:46 PM
To: rachelf@ix.netcom.com; 'Todd Boyle'
Cc: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: AW: [ebxml-dev] RE: [EDI-L] Article on ebXML Core
Components ...


From: Rachel Foerster
> Your points are good ones. But the concept of seeking complexity is
> worthwhile exploring. My experience and observation in many things,
and not
> just software, is that if you start out with a very simple tool
without much
> complexity, make it a very useful tool that truly solves a problem,
then
> over time the user who gets hooked on the very simple tool with ask
for and
> use more complexity that's built on the simple tool they use and like.

Just send orders by email.

I'm very happy with simple tools
if they actually solve my problem.
So then it depends on what problem
I need to solve, which was my point.

I'm not sure what the sweet spot for ebXML
adoption will turn out to be.  I'm sure it is
less than the full feature set, but suspect
fire-and-forget is a little less than the sweet
spot.

QuickBooks to QuickBooks would be a killer,
but I thought Intuit was working on it with their own
proprietary scheme. No?

-Bob Haugen


----------------------------------------------------------------
The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>