RE: [ebxml-dev] Core Components

[Tony Slosar <Tony.Slosar@supplysolution.com>]

Thanks all,

I am designing our process to use ebXML to transport, route, package BODs (as payload) and was curious if that was overkill.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrzej Jan Taramina [mailto:andrzej@chaeron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:00 PM
To: ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] Core Components


Farrukh said:

> Again lay opinion to be used with care...
> 
> cc are not based directly on OAG BODs though I suspect that the BOD work
> was part of the rich experience base that the CC team built upon.

The way I've understood it is that OAG BOD's are one level up in the "ebXML 
evolutionary scale", since they are complete payload definitions (business 
document definitions like Purchase Orders, ASN's, etc.).  

Core Components would typically be finer grained, more like field definitions, 
and be used in a mix 'n match fashion to create new payload document 
definitions (eg. Amount field, Tax field, etc...)

So in a sense, CC's would be the "raw" ingredients that could be used to 
create new BOD's.

Note:  Current OAG BOD's do not use ebXML CC's.  This example is just for 
illustration.


Andrzej Jan Taramina
Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions
http://www.chaeron.com


----------------------------------------------------------------
The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>