[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: EDI & XML for shipping, transport and 3PL
Below useful links http://www.ecbs.org/ which is describing the payment initiation ePI committted to by European banks and http://www.fba.fi/finvoice which is the common standard for banks in Finland - soon Nordic area for e-invoicing based on ePI, XML and SOAP (40 000 corporates now signed up in Finland only). As each and every invoicer will have to move to e-invoicing with a common format at least in the middle I see a shortcut to very widespread webservices (and rfid + nearfield communication with mobiles do plug in nicely. This will also mean much less store/forward and batch processing which fits in rather badly in a networked economy. We did not really have the ambition to standardise the invoice - the SOAPenvelope can carry any format. But we did provide a 150 field standard one. Now it turns out that it is good enough for all ! As over 50 software providers already support it the question is have we created UBL as a sideproduct ? In any case you do not have to change software even if change bank.. Without standards - no competition Without competition - very slow development Slow development we cannot afford. Regards Bo Harald -----Original Message----- From: NS1-Dr. K. F. Lee [mailto:kflee@itnc.com] Sent: 1. heinäkuuta 2005 8:12 To: 'Bo Harald'; 'Werner, James K'; 'steve capell'; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: EDI & XML for shipping, transport and 3PL Dear Sir, Any one with idea where to find DTD or XML definition for said business? Please point us a direction. Rgds, Kfl. -----Original Message----- From: Bo Harald [mailto:harald@sypbh.pp.fi] Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'Werner, James K'; 'steve capell'; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Is ebXML already a valid alternative for EDI ? The European payment initiation standard ePI has been integrated into electronic invoices sent through the payment system in Finland and Sweden and gradually other Nordic countries. Smaller companies and entrepreneurs do not use any software but key in invoices in the netbank interface (just as payments) and these are forwarded to both e-receivers (in SOAP-envelope) with netbank agreements (almost all business and 80% of private) and printed to non-e. Larger companies often have invested heavily in edi-formats to send and to receive. It has turned out to be very easy to reformate into and out of xml - any number of suppliers offering it. Still it is difficult to see why edi would not start to loose ground (especially new applications avoiding it) - reformatting has its cost - and of course the reducing of complexity in legacy environments will steere towards this - even if webservices is promising to stretch some of the life of old applications. Bo Harald Head of Payments and e-services Nordea Bank -----Original Message----- From: Werner, James K [mailto:james.k.werner@boeing.com] Sent: 8. helmikuuta 2005 20:20 To: steve capell; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Is ebXML already a valid alternative for EDI ? <lurker off> ". . . a larger community of medium and smaller businesses that cannot easily support EDI infrastructure costs . . . " This debate rages on - a brushfire at the moment but a drought of good information is bound to set it off again. It is interesting to me that this debate always comes up in the context of engaging small and medium sized suppliers in the customer's e-purchase cycle. EDI cost is still waved about as the barrier of choice. Seems to me that the real barrier has always been and will always be integration on the recipient end of the data stream. Producing an electronic PO is far easier and less complex than consuming it. Is EDI still an expensive technology? James K. Werner The Boeing Company Supplier Network Systems Integration Architect Cowboy Wisdom: "Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment." NOTICE: This communication may contain proprietary or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC