[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] EDI & XML for shipping, transport and 3PL
Dear Dr. Lee, EDIFACT, as you very well know, is widely used in international shipping. Domestic transportation is decently supported by ANSI X12 EDI standards (widely used for land based transportation logistics in north America). For a pretty comprehensive suite of XML standards for the said subject see www.rosettanet.org, and navigate to RosettaNet Home > Standards > PIPs > Cluster 3: Order Management > Segment 3B: Transportation and Distribution Some other PIPs are also used in this area, but this set should give you an idea. I am sure, others in the list will have many other pointers as well. Hopefully, these keywords should be enough to "google" till you find what you want! Regards, -Suresh -------------------------www.sterlingcommerce.com ------------------- Suresh Damodaran Ph.D. 469-524-2676(O) Senior Software Architect 469-323-0234(Cell) Applied Research Sterling Commerce, subsidiary of SBC Communications ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------- -----Original Message----- From: NS1-Dr. K. F. Lee [mailto:kflee@itnc.com] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:12 AM To: 'Bo Harald'; 'Werner, James K'; 'steve capell'; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: [ebxml-dev] EDI & XML for shipping, transport and 3PL Dear Sir, Any one with idea where to find DTD or XML definition for said business? Please point us a direction. Rgds, Kfl. -----Original Message----- From: Bo Harald [mailto:harald@sypbh.pp.fi] Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 3:06 PM To: 'Werner, James K'; 'steve capell'; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Is ebXML already a valid alternative for EDI ? The European payment initiation standard ePI has been integrated into electronic invoices sent through the payment system in Finland and Sweden and gradually other Nordic countries. Smaller companies and entrepreneurs do not use any software but key in invoices in the netbank interface (just as payments) and these are forwarded to both e-receivers (in SOAP-envelope) with netbank agreements (almost all business and 80% of private) and printed to non-e. Larger companies often have invested heavily in edi-formats to send and to receive. It has turned out to be very easy to reformate into and out of xml - any number of suppliers offering it. Still it is difficult to see why edi would not start to loose ground (especially new applications avoiding it) - reformatting has its cost - and of course the reducing of complexity in legacy environments will steere towards this - even if webservices is promising to stretch some of the life of old applications. Bo Harald Head of Payments and e-services Nordea Bank -----Original Message----- From: Werner, James K [mailto:james.k.werner@boeing.com] Sent: 8. helmikuuta 2005 20:20 To: steve capell; dnickull@adobe.com; chiusano_joseph@bah.com; Monica.Martin@Sun.COM; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] Is ebXML already a valid alternative for EDI ? <lurker off> ". . . a larger community of medium and smaller businesses that cannot easily support EDI infrastructure costs . . . " This debate rages on - a brushfire at the moment but a drought of good information is bound to set it off again. It is interesting to me that this debate always comes up in the context of engaging small and medium sized suppliers in the customer's e-purchase cycle. EDI cost is still waved about as the barrier of choice. Seems to me that the real barrier has always been and will always be integration on the recipient end of the data stream. Producing an electronic PO is far easier and less complex than consuming it. Is EDI still an expensive technology? James K. Werner The Boeing Company Supplier Network Systems Integration Architect Cowboy Wisdom: "Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment." NOTICE: This communication may contain proprietary or other confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, please do not print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information. Also, please indicate to the sender that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete the copy you received.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC