Dale and others,
There was some discussion on this recently on
UBL-DEV:
For SWIFT, something like:
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:iso6523:0021
would work.
Pim From: Moberg Dale [mailto:dmoberg@axway.com] Sent: 05 August 2009 17:40 To: charles.kilkenny@actuare.com; ebxml-dev@lists.ebxml.org Cc: Pim van der Eijk Subject: RE: [ebxml-dev] <PartyId type="?SWIFT BIC?">BBBBCCLL123<\PartyId> Hi, Thanks for pointing out the broken link. I will ask
OASIS whether they can fix it. The ebCore TC now is charged with maintenance of
CPPA versions. The version 3 of CPPA is progressing slowly and will
have the approved party id identifier material included whenever we are able to
finish the editorial work. Meanwhile the material from version 3, section 4.3.1
(subject to change) that should also be at the link is attached to this reply.
It is in the open office open document format. (There may be some variation from
the material at the link but I cannot be certain until I get OASIS to fix the
link.) [Also the text is short enough to insert after
discussion of the SWIFT value.] Now for Swift from ISO 6523 Data interchange- Structure
for the identification of organizations, I find ICD : 0021 Name of coding system: SOCIETY FOR WORLDWIDE
INTERBANK FINANCIAL TELECOMMUNICATION
S.W.I.F.T. Name & address : SOCIETY FOR WORLDWIDE INTERBANK
FINANCIAL of issuing TELECOMMUNICATION
S.W.I.F.T. organization Avenue Adele,1 B - 1310 La Hulpe Tel: +32 2 6553111 Fax: +32 2 6553226 Structure of : 1) ICD 4
Digits code Organization code upto 11
characters Organization name upto 250
characters 2) None Display : None requirements Description of : Bank's identifiers for financial
transfer on the organizations S.W.I.F.T.
Network. covered by coding system Notes on use : To be used for assignment of object
identifiers of code (ISO 8824/8825) Sponsoring : S.W.I.F.T. authority Date of issue : September
1990 of ICD Additional : None Comments Unfortunately an explicit abbreviated name entry is not
provided, although S.W.I.F.T is apparently
intended. This would mean that the method (approved by the old
CPPA TC) currently yields within the approved errata for version 2,
either urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:S.W.I.F.T:0021 or
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:SocietyForWorldwideInterbankFinancialTelecommunicationS.W.I.F.T.:0021 I like the shorter one. Both of these are
the party-id type values.
Explicit values for banks would presumably be defined by SWIFT and these would
be the actual party id values, as your subject line
shows.
Also, I should mention that, for version
3, I must check whether the above two options are the only options
-- with Pim van der Eijk, as it seems to me that an additional shortening of
uuid has been under discussion for version 3. It apparently has not made its way
into the current working draft for version 3. PartyId
Element The PartyID element provides an identifier
that SHALL be used to logically identify the Party. The value of the PartyID element is an
non-empty string that provides an identifier. This is the convention used, for
example, within a CPP or CPA when leveraged with
ebMS. The PartyId
element has a
single attribute: type
that has an anyURI [XMLSCHEMA-2] value. In a CPP or CPA, the type
value of the type attribute SHOULD be a URN [RFC2141] that defines a namespace
for the value or content of the PartyId element. Typically, the URN would be
registered in a well-known directory of organization
identifiers. For a CPP or CPA,
if the
type
attribute is not present, the value or content of the
PartyId element MUST be a URI that conforms to
[RFC2396]. While an identifier may be understood by
both Parties in a CPA, messaging protocols such as ebMS recommend the use of
URIs. Within ebMS, the value or content of the PartyId
MUST be a URI
that conforms to [RFC2396]. Additional PartyId elements MAY be present under the same
PartyInfo
element so as
to provide for alternative logical identifiers for the Party. In a CPP, if the Party has preferences as to which logical
identifier is used, the PartyId
elements
SHOULD be listed in order of preference starting with the most-preferred
identifier. In a
CPP that contains multiple
PartyInfo elements, different PartyInfo elements MAY contain PartyId
elements that
define different logical identifiers. This permits a large organization, for
example, to have different identifiers for different business or other technical
purposes. If multiple PartyId
elements occur under the same PartyInfo element in the
CPA, all of those
PartyInfo
elements MUST be included in the Message Header. This applies,
for example, when protocol bindings such as ebMS v2 are
used. The value of
the PartyId element is any string that provides a
unique identifier. The identifier MAY be understood by both Parties to a CPA. Several schemes exist for
naming identifier domains. [ISO6523] enumerates values for many domains: the
domain is identified by a four-digit numeric sequence. For example, the ISO 6523
ICD 0060 identifies the Dun & Bradstreet domain. Typically, the identifier would be listed
in well-known directories such as DUNS (Dun and Bradstreet) or in any naming
system specified by [ISO6523]. Alternatively, the code list for ISO 9735
(UN/EDIFACT syntax) D.3 Service simple data element 0007 (routing Identification
Code qualifier) can be used to name identifier domains [ISO9735].
ANSI ASC [X12] Data Element I05 (Interchange ID Qualifier)
element, used in the ISA Interchange Control Header segment, also provides a
list of code values for naming domains. These three serve
as "catalogues" of schemes for naming identifier domains; processes exist by
which additional domains can be identified through the Registration Authorities
(RA):
The following
example shows how URNs are used for the type attribute and for the PartyId element
value. <PartyInfo
partyName="CompanyA"
defaultMshChannelId="asyncChannelA1" defaultMshPackageId="CompanyA_MshSignalPackage"> <PartyId
type="urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:duns">123456789</PartyId>... <tp:PartyId>urn:icann:example.com</tp:PartyId> The first example indicates the Party's DUNS number for the
organization using a type attribute with a URN value. The value of the PartyId element itself is
the DUNS number of the organization, which is a string of digits assigned by the
agency. The second example shows an arbitrary URN as a PartyId value. No type is
indicated, but the value might be a URN that the Party has registered with
the Internet Assigned Numbers
Authority [IANA] (http://www.iana.org) to identify itself
directly. When these naming
conventions are used, values are generated for the type attribute from
information items using a well-known directory of organization identifiers such
as ISO6523. A method to standardize URNs used as PartyId@type values using
ISO6523 is described. This method adheres to the rules, requirements and
recommendations of a CPP or CPA, or ebMS. An implementation SHOULD provide support, and be able to accommodate,
the usage of the type
values standardized herein (See four bullets that
follow).
Abbreviated Name:
“D-U-N-S Number” Upper-camel-case
resultant string: “D-U-N-SNumber” tp:type="
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:D-U-N-SNumber:0060" Note: “0060” is the ICD value of
D-U-N-S Number. To be consistent
with v2 CPP/A, the value that follows remains a valid type attribute value or
content for the PartyId element:
“urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:duns”.
Transformed
Camel-case: “DataUniversalNumberingSystem” tp:type="
urn:oasis:names:tc:ebxml-cppa:partyid-type:DataUniversalNumberingSystem:0060"
From:
charles.kilkenny@actuare.com [mailto:charles.kilkenny@actuare.com] Hi, The link
at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/documents/PartyID_Types.shtml referenced
in the ebcpp-2[1].1-april-5-2005-draft.doc document appears to be
broken. I've searched and searched, and sorry if
these questions have already been asked ... does anybody know where the list of
ebMS PartyId type URNs are maintained? Does anybody know the URN for a SWIFT BIC
(ISO-9362)? I would guess "urn:swift" would be insufficient and it is not clear
whether the URN is ISO or SWIFT. Also, ISO 6523 only gives the code "0021" and
not the URN. RFC 3615 doesn't help either. Thanks. Charles |