[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: ebXML JMT and eBSC]]

["Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>]

There's been a conversation between myself and Alan, and myself and Mark 
Palmer, NIST about the recently formed eBusiness Standards Convergence 
group.  Alan wished to try to improve the work and output of this new 
group that has participants from many industries and areas. 

Would the JMT be interested in participating in this forum?

Thanks.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [Fwd: Re: ebXML JMT and eBSC]
Date: 	Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:04:21 -0400
From: 	Alan Kotok <akotok@disa.org>
To: 	Monica J. Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>



Monica:

Thanks for Mark's response.  Officially, I'm the co-chair of the ebXML 
speakers sub-committee (with Sang Shin), so you better get the JMT's take 
on participation.

Alan Kotok
Editor, < E-Business*Standards*Today />
http://www.disa.org/dailywire/
Data Interchange Standards Association
akotok@disa.org
+1 703-518-4174



At 01:47 PM 6/19/03 -0600, you wrote:
>Should we send this to the ebXML-mktg-sc list to get responses?  Or would 
>you like to answer?
>Monica
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject:        Re: ebXML JMT and eBSC
>Date:   Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:17:56 -0400
>From:   Mark Palmer <mark.palmer@nist.gov>
>To:     monica.martin@sun.com
>References:     <5.1.0.14.2.20030618154352.01fd6fc8@mailserver.nist.gov> 
><5.1.0.14.2.20030618154352.01fd6fc8@mailserver.nist.gov>
>
>
>
>As to promoting visibility and formally publishing, I planned to first get 
>agreement on the web site information and Workshop summary 
>report.  yesterdays conf call was the first step in that.   Many 
>organizations have not yet responded to confirm follow through on their 
>agreed actions, e.g., confirming that they want to be listed as a 
>participant.  I want to complete that process before pushing out a lot of info.
>
>Are there others from the ebXML JMT who want to provide input or 
>participate in eBSC?  Mark Crawford and Garry Minakawa are already 
>participating as representatives/participants of ebXML and UN/CEFACT.  I 
>hoped that would provide a sufficient linkage.
>Does that need to be supplemented?
>The email distribution is intended for those who are going to actually 
>WORK on the eBSC tasks, not as a general information distribution 
>mechanism. the web site is intended to provide the general public access.
>
>Call if you want to discuss what you think I am missing.  I am in Germany 
>next week.
>
>--mp
>
>At 11:23 AM 6/19/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>For overall visibility, Mark, I have received a suggestion from the
>>ebXML JMT that you coordinate with them with your information
>>distribution.  Several of the team members are very active in overall
>>standards development and publish to Daily Wire, Web Services.org, ebXML
>>Forum, et al.  Thanks.
>>Monica
>>
>