Re: [ebxml-mktg-sc] Re: [offline] RE: [ebxml-mktg-sc] [Fwd: [CEFACT-LWG:261] ebXML legal issues]

["Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>]

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:

>Mark,
>
>I was thinking of something more cool, liquid and refreshing!
>
>I'm reminded of people trashing Galileo for saying the world
>is round, when obviously it is flat, and then claiming 
>they had no knowledge that the Inquistion used their
>articles to burn people at the stake.
>
>I don't mind people having counter views - but I do
>get upset when they are just hearsay and not supported
>by the facts.
>  
>
mm1: I reiterate my question - was this brought to the attention of the 
JCC before the article was written; was the concern aired there first; 
and if not on first two counts, I would respectfully ask JCC to answer 
the mail - particularly CEFACT who has just voted to recommend the ebXML 
standards.
Thanks.

>The constitution allows you to have an opinion - but not
>to deliberately state things that are not true to wilfully harm
>someone or something.  I'm sure David would be happily
>looking to sue on behalf of his client if the shoe was
>on the other foot.
>
>DW.
>==================================================
>Message text written by "Yader, Mark (GXS)"
>  
>
>David,
>
>Time for some of my Prozac ?
>
>Mark
><
>
>
>  
>