[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ebxml-mktg] RE: [ebxml-dev] Gartner and ebXML - distribution of thearticle
Rachel, I must pick up on this. I have been tirelessly working from day-one in ebXML and before to ensure that we have technology that is able to be deployed into environments with limited technical resources and without the need for complex tools. Certainly the new work that the CCR and now BRIM working group that I chair has been doing over the last year is fully focused on providing simple XML based mechanisms to achieve critical functionality - payload assembly - and nouns and verbs support for core components and business information entities (component aggregates). In fact the latest assembly work is a DIRECT result of working with business staff as part of the OAG sponsored STAR effort with ebXML - and providing mechanisms that make OAGIS V8.0 easier and simpler to implement and manage for end users, not programmers. You should particularly note that W3C XML and schema is woefully inadequate in these areas - as is other technologies such as RELAX NG. To be fair - they were never intended to solve these problems - and are being purposed out-of-scope. OAGIS have used XSLT and Examplotron to bolster the gaps today. And I've been tracking Schema for the past two years closely - it will never be SME friendly on its current path, whereas ebXML is delivering technology that clearly is. So I take issue with the assertion that ebXML is not SME friendly. People should not confuse robust and comprehensive standard specifications with difficulty of use. Vendors are deploying solutions that are engineered around the standards that do make it simple for the end user. Again I would point to the OAG/STAR pathfinder - where simple web screens allow users to manage, launch and track message exchanges. At this point in the game - we should do well to remember too - that the key large players will drive ebXML forward, and that the SME base will grow and benefit from that as vertical industry applications adopt ebXML based underpinning. While it is true that certain aspects of ebXML are highly research based, this is not inappropriate - two years from now these pieces will seem common place. Today however ebXML is providing clear and focused components that make sense, and are tested and proven. Rome was not built in a day, and certainly not by ignoring the wishes of all citizen communities! Thanks, DW. ========================================================= Message text written by Rachel Forster >On the other hand, I've been watching the ongoing work of the various technical committees and work groups, especially those continuing the ebXML work under UN/CEFACT and have grave concerns about the extreme complexity now being built into the various specifications. It appears to me that the needs and focus on the SME have been totally eclipsed by the big guys. I can remember my remarks at the ebXML Brussels meeting in May, 2000, that if ebXML does not meet the needs of the SME, it will fail. I hope that this is not what I'm observing at the present time. Thus, Gartner's comments below about the "good enough" certainly ring true. <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC