Fwd: suggested values for POC using PIP3A4

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

As requested. Nick.

>Reply-To: <fho@webMethods.com>
>From: "Francis Ho" <francis.ho@webMethods.com>
>To: "Nicholas Kassem" <nick.kassem@eng.sun.com>
>Subject: suggested values for POC using PIP3A4
>Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:59:01 -0400
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>Importance: Normal
>
>hi nick,
>
>can you post this to the ebXML-POC mailing list?
>
>My mail keeps on getting bounced.
>
>thanks,
>
>francis
>
>-----------------------------------------------
>In order to get the previous interoperability demo going (for Brussels),
>there had to be a lot of agreement and shared assumptions.  One good thing
>about using PIP3A4 to do this interoperability test is that the documents
>and processes associated with PIP3A4 are published and well known.
>Hopefully, getting trading partner agreements going should be much easier.
>However, there are still elements that need to be agreed upon and here are
>the header values that I suggest we use for the  interoperability test using
>PIP3A4:
>
>Company Name     Duns #
>111111111        webMethods
>222222222        Sun Microsystems
>333333333        Vitria
>444444444        Fujitsu
>555555555        Viquity
>
>
>DocumentLabel    PIP3A4
>DocumentId       cid:0987654321 (not sure on this)
>
>
>MessageId              GUID to keep the messages unique
>RefToMessageId         MessageId
>ReliableMessagingInfo  AtMostOnce
>
>cheers,
>
>fh
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>Francis Ho
>Manager, Industry Products Group
>webMethods, Inc. (NASDAQ:WEBM)
>3930 Pender Drive
>Fairfax, VA  22030 USA
>Ofc:  703.460.2500
>Fax:  703.460.2599
>mailto: francis.ho@webmethods.com
>Url: http://www.webMethods.com
>
>We're Hiring: http://jobs.webmethods.com
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++