[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-)
Is it a possibility to use the eCo Framework on the top of registry services ? cheers -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 8:29 AM To: richard drummond Cc: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org Subject: Re: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-) Rik, Dont we want to use ebXML Registry Services rather than eCo framework? Please clarify? -- Regards, Farrukh richard drummond wrote: > for the registry, could we use the eco frame work stuff for a discovery > process. bp has discussed this? rik > > -----Original Message----- > From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:39 AM > To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org > Subject: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-) > > Hi all, > > As promised during our last con call, I was thinking about Tokyo POC > choreography and here are my thoughts: > > I have also added whom we should be co-ordinating with, from my limited > knowledge. Pl let me know if I am going in the right direction and if this > helps. I can take the first cut at drawing sequence diagrams as well. David > Burdett has some very nice use cases on some of the process. How can I get > in touch with him ? > > ------------------- Here are the top level > steps ----------------------------- > > 1. Registry/Repository comes up (RegRep) > a) Could be local or remote > b) If local *and* remote, we need to worry about sync et al > c) May be for Tokyo POC, remote is better > > 2. Catalog Aggregator comes up > a) I would like to see if we can get some form of Catalog Aggregator > b) This way, we abstract out the knowledge of the product details > c) Again could be local or remote > > 3. Seller(s) comes up > a) May be seller(s) will host catalogs as well > > 4. Seller(s) registers with the registry/repository (regRep) > > 5. Seller(s) updates catalogs (Service Layer (?)) > > 6. Hubs come up > > 7. Hubs interact with the registry/repository (regRep, BP) > > 8. Buyers come up > > 9. Buyers discover sellers/hubs thru the registry/repository (regRep, BP) > a) The message set/use case would be in conjunction with the BP team > b) David Burdett has some very nice use cases on this process. > How can I get in touch with him ? > c) They also discover supported business processes, message types et al > d) At this time, the profiles are pulled out and looked for a match et al. > > 10. Buyers enter into TPA with the ones they choose (TPA Team) > > 11. Buyers and sellers/hubs exchange messages (Core Components/Messaging) > a) Buyer sends an RFP to say 3 sellers > b) Sellers/hubs send out quote > c) Buyer selects one seller/hub > d) Hub/Seller sends out confirmation > e) Buyer sends PO > f) Seller sends out status (Order Booked, Shipped) > g) Seller sends out invoice > h) Buyer ack shipment/receipt > i) Buyer send out advice of payment > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > -------- > > Notes : > > i) All are based on the APIs provided by the various parts of ebXML. > ii) The POC might develop a few services as a thin layer on top of the > ebXML - thus showing extensibility of the framework. > iii) Also, if possible, I would like us to push for more dynamic and > configurable system. > iv) I also would like to see if we can demonstrate some security - like > certificates for interacting with the registry/repository. > v) Nick, should I be working with Karsten/Steve on this to sync with the > main proposal? > vi) All, again, please let know your thoughts, suggestions et al - the > good, the bad and the ugly. > > cheers > ---------------------------------------------------------- > | | Krishna Sankar > :|: :|: Member of technical Staff > :|||: :|||: Internet Commerce > ..:|||||||:..:|||||||:.. (Ph) 408-853-8475 > Cisco Systems Inc ksankar@cisco.com > ---------------------------------------------------------- > "Failure is certain if we don't, > but Success is uncertain even when we do. > So the choice is Ours, always..." > ----------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC