RE: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-)

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

I think we are basically on the same page but (as you know) discussing 
stuff in a WG is not the same thing as having it specified and *reviewed*. 
I will defer to the experts in the appropriate WGs on this but it *must* be 
specified and reviewed publicly. Has regrep specified eCo too? If not - 
let's have that discussion ? Farrukh, if I'm not mistaken you are on the 
regrep WG can you raise this on their agenda ? Let me know when their next 
conf. call is - I'll try to call in. Thanks in advance.

Nick

At 01:56 PM 9/7/2000 -0500, richard drummond wrote:
>it was just a suggestion, since bp has already discussed this.... it is not
>clear to me it is half-cocked.... even though it is clear to me you have
>enough on your plate and don't need any more.   rik
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nicholas Kassem [mailto:Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:43 PM
>To: richard drummond; arofan.gregory@commerceone.com
>Cc: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org; Klaus-Dieter Naujok; Bill Smith
>Subject: RE: Tokyo POC choreography - my 2c ;-)
..snip