Fwd: draft of our proposal

[Nicholas Kassem <nick.kassem@eng.sun.com>]

Thanks for forwarding this Sig. Clearly, there is still a lot of detail 
missing but I think it's important that your proposal gets visibility to 
the entire WG so there can be a better and common understanding of what's 
going on.

As for me - I would like to get some understanding of what the proposed 
payload looks like (DTD's, XML etc.) - is this public ? How is this 
proposal related to the CC/BP specs (spec. version #'s etc.) ? Just as a 
background, my goal is and has been to do Proof Of Specification events 
within the context of ebXML- hence the need for supporting POC with ebXML 
specifications. I have to assume that the Repository you are proposing is 
consistent with the RegRep work going on in the ebXML RegRep WG ? Is this 
correct ?

Regards,
Nick

>Importance: Normal
>Subject: draft of our proposal
>To: Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>
>Cc: lms@wwnet.com, mblantz@ltvsteel.com,
>         Lisa Seaburg <lisa.seaburg@commerceone.com>, linkage@interaccess.com,
>         Melanie.McCarthy@gm.com, sfuger@aiag.org
>From: "Sigmund Handelman/Watson/IBM" <swhandel@us.ibm.com>
>Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:58:36 -0400
>X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML243/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.4a |July 
>24, 2000) at
>  09/25/2000 02:02:13 PM
>
>Hello,
>
>Here is the draft of what we are putting proposing. Addtional material will
>be going into the document tomorrow.
>
>This proposal is based on Karsten Riemer's document, and much of the front
>text is the same. The second part describes our scenarios.
>
>Any questions, please contact me at 1-914-784-7626.
>
>Regards, Sig
>
>(See attached file: ebXMLBPCCpocProposal Materials Mgmt.doc)

ebXMLBPCCpocProposal Materials Mgmt.doc