RE: depth attribute in GetClassificationTreeRequest

[Mark Hale <hale@ajubasolutions.com>]

I think this is reasonable and does not detract from the functionality of
the demonstration.

	Thanks,

	Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:51 AM
> To: ebXML poc
> Subject: depth attribute in GetClassificationTreeRequest
>
>
>
> I would like to propose that as a scope reduction we ignore implementing
> support for the depth attribute of GetClassificationTreeRequest. It
> allows for getting the sub-tree under a specified ClassificationNode in
> a classification tree upto specified depth. I recommend that we only
> support the default value of depth=1 (i.e. get only the immediaqte
> children of specified node). This is quite adequate for the POC demo and
> does not take anything away in terms of end-user visible functionality.
>
> In interoperability terms all this means is that clients should not be
> written  to specify a depth value other than 1. Registry implementations
> can save some implementation time and only return immediate children.
>
> Please let me know if any Registry implementors are opposed to this
> scope reduction. Silence implies agreement.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>