Re: RM again

[Nicholas Kassem <nick.kassem@eng.sun.com>]

Thanks for your input Jacques. The process is simple, all we need is a 
majority of the committed participants to agree. However my suggestion is 
that we have an informed vote following the f2f next week - rather than 
doing that now. Does this seem reasonable ?

Nick

>Also, it may help to better define the  "consensus" process at some
>point.
>When it comes to backing a demo feature, should we only  count the vote
>of those who can/will commit
>to implement it? I believe that we need indeed to have a general
>consensus on the spec,
>but it would be sufficient to get  just a few vendors to commit to
>implement (say, one more than
>required to demo the feature). Open to discussion...
>
>Jacques Durand
>Savvion