Re: RM again

[jacques durand <jacques@savvion.com>]

Hi Nick:

f2f seems definitely the place to discuss RM (should we have a presentation?)

I assume most of us would have had time to read the spec by then... :)

Nicholas Kassem wrote:

> Thanks for your input Jacques. The process is simple, all we need is a
> majority of the committed participants to agree.

(I assume you mean "agree to update to POC demo draft".
Only *some* participants would need implement it, like for other features)

> However my suggestion is
> that we have an informed vote following the f2f next week - rather than
> doing that now. Does this seem reasonable ?

Seems fair. Though the more we wait, the less time for feedback to TR&P...
(Anyone having any question on the specs today,  should probably not wait
next
week to give feedback to TR&P and POC.)

Regards,

Jacques