RE: upcoming POC work?

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

I'm back from down-under and NYC so sorry for the radio silence.
You are correct Scott. The game plan is to propose work-items in the 
following order:

1) Functionality backed by ebXML specifications
2) Functionality consistent with the architectural direction of ebXML
3) Functionality capable of being dlivered by the POC participants

Nick

p.s. Note that as in the past - it's not necessary for all participants to 
do everything.

At 11:14 AM 11/20/2000 -0600, Scott Hinkelman wrote:
>Keep in mind that any POC proposals must be able to be backed up one way
>or another with resources from companies able and willing to do the work.
>There is not necessarily a direct mapping between workgroup priorities
>and willingness/abilities from involved POC companies.
>
>Nick K, correct me if I am wrong..........
>
>Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
>XML Industry Enablement
>IBM e-business Standards Strategy
>512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
>srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074
>
>
>
>"Blantz, Mary Kay" <mblantz@netfish.com> on 11/17/2000 02:20:29 PM
>
>To:   "'Krishna Sankar'" <ksankar@cisco.com>, "Munter, Joel D"
>       <joel.d.munter@intel.com>, ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org
>cc:   ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
>Subject:  RE: upcoming POC work?
>
>
>
>I trust that the ad hoc query would somehow be against a business
>process model.  Is that correct?
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:03 PM
>To: Munter, Joel D; ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org
>Cc: ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org
>Subject: RE: upcoming POC work?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>      In Tokyo, the regrep team has prioritized the capabilities into
>various
>buckets. Ad Hoc Query is in Phase 1 scope and so we will show Ad Hoc query
>in Vancouver. From what I know, the pub-sub is not in Phase 1 and so will
>not be in Vancouver.
>
>      cheers
>
>      Scott/Farrukh, can we get that prioritized list of features ?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Munter, Joel D [mailto:joel.d.munter@intel.com]
>Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 8:26 AM
>To: ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org
>Subject: RE: upcoming POC work?
>
>
>Mark,
>
>Based on Reg/Rep team discussions in Tokyo, should we also assume that the
>following will be targeted for POC in Vancouver?
>      Reg/Rep - Ad Hoc query
>      Reg/Rep - Publish and Subscribe
>Thanks,
>Joel Munter
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark A. Hale [mailto:mark.hale@interwoven.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 10:27 AM
>To: hdain@ectone.com; ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org
>Subject: RE: upcoming POC work?
>
>
>Dain,
>
>Thank you for the interest and welcome.  At this time, the POC is
>collecting
>topics for the Vancouver demonstration.  The discussions to date included
>things such as:
>
>      Security
>      Reliable Messaging
>      Business Processes/Core Components
>      International Trading
>      Marketplaces
>      Multiple Transports
>
>We hope to have a list by the first week of December so we can begin to
>narrow down the list.  Please feel free to add topics (by posting to this
>list) that are representative of new specification functionality.
>
>      Thanks,
>
>      Mark
>
>
>________________________________________________________________________
>Mark A. Hale                                            408-220-7483 tel
>Standards Architect                                     408-774-2002 fax
>Interwoven                                     mark.hale@intwerwoven.com
>1195 W. Fremont Avenue                         http://www.interwoven.com
>Sunnyvale, CA  94087
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hansen Dain [mailto:hdain@ectone.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 12:46 PM
> > To: ebXML-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > Subject: RE: upcoming POC work?
> >
> >
> > What remaining POC work is there to be completed? Our company
> > would like to
> > sign up to help out for any upcoming work. I would like to be in on a
> > conference call if there is one scheduled. Please let me know the
>details,
> > since I am new to this. Thanks,
> >
> > -Dain
> >
> > Dain Hansen
> > ECtone
> > dhansen@ectone.com
> >
> >
> >