OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ebxml-poc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: POC Press event Ideas


Hi Krishna,

This looks good.  Can we (you, Philippe, Sid, Ed Julson and myself) work on this next
week?  In the interest of time, I like to work on this with a core group of people
and then present it to the rest of the participants (if anyone else is really
interested in working on this, please let me know).  We want to keep in mind the
bigger picture of what ebXML is all about and push some of the general ebXML
messages.

Cheers,
Steve

Krishna Sankar wrote:

> Hi,
>
>         Thanks. From what I know, the GCI Vs AIAG depends on the participants
> (marketing is neutral on this) - IBM and IPnet. And we need to include our
> esteemed contemporary Philippe which means a hub in the setup ;-)
>
>         I like the CGI Marketplace scenario better, but then how would we include
> IBM and IPNet ?
>
>         cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe DeSmedt [mailto:PDeSmedt@viquity.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:32 PM
> To: 'Krishna Sankar'
> Cc: Ed Julson; carol.geyer@oasis-open.org; susan.struble@eng.sun.com;
> Simon.Nicholson@eng.sun.com; steven.yung@sun.com; ebXML poc
> Subject: RE: POC Press event Ideas
>
> Krishna,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. From what I heard through a colleague who was on
> the ebXML marketing team's conference call this morning, they're leaning
> towards showing the GCI scenario versus the AIAG scenario (marketing folks:
> please correct me if I'm wrong). As far as Viquity is concerned, we can play
> in either scenario. I'll leave it up to IBM and IPNet (with input, of
> course, from anyone who has an opinion either way) to decide which one to
> show. Other than that, the proposal appears to provide a pretty good balance
> of participants as well as of areas of ebXML to cover in this event.
>
> -Philippe
> _______________________________
> Philippe De Smedt
> Architect
> Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com)
> 1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue
> Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102
> (408) 548-9722
> (408) 747-5586 (fax)
> pdesmedt@viquity.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2000 2:22 PM
> To: ebXML poc
> Cc: Ed Julson; carol.geyer@oasis-open.org; susan.struble@eng.sun.com;
> Simon.Nicholson@eng.sun.com; steven.yung@sun.com
> Subject: POC Press event Ideas
>
> Hi all,
>
>         Here is a preliminary POC plan for the press event. Please think
> thru and
> see if this is workable, fair and includes everybody who wants to
> participate.
>
>         Start with Nick's POC slides (Nick)
>         Go to the Architecture slide upto the point where the three
> transparent
> boxes appear showing the design, configuration and run time. (Mark)
>
>         Go directly to the TPA track - intro slide (Krishna)
>         TPA track sequence diagram (Krishna)
>         TPA Track topology
>                 Farrukh's GUI (Farrukh)
>                         Shows interoperable registry by Sun, XMLs and
> Sterling
>                 Mark's GUI (Mark) showing TPA formation
>                 Fujitsu-Netfish (showing TPA Proposal) (Iwasa,Sanjay)
>
>                 *********** Question : Do we have NetFish and Fujitsu
> participation to
> show this ?
>
>         Introduce AIAG track (Sid)
>         AIAG Track - Marketplace example
>
>                 IPNet - Viquity - IBM
>
>                 *********** Question : Does this make sense ? Can
> IPnet/Viquity/IBM work
> this out Or
>
>                                 Should we do the GCI track with
> IPNet-Viquity-IBM ?
>
>         end of demo
>
>                 *********** Did we leave out anybody ?
>
>         My approximation is this will take about 25 minutes.
>
>         Ed/Susy/Steve,
>
>         We need 20-25 minutes to show the breadth of vendor participation. I
> think
> it is Ok as we need to show that this is real and many companies *have*
> stuff working across their products.
>
>         If we have three screens as follows it would be good:
>
>         #1 projector with 4 or 8 monitor switch to show buyer side
>         #2 projector with 4 or 8 monitor switch to show seller/supplier side
>         #3 projector tied to one computer to show the slides
>
>         In Tokyo, we had two projectors and used one for the slides. So we
> switched
> between the buyer/seller with one projector
>
>         cheers

--

Steve Yung, steven.yung@sun.com
Market Segment Manager
XML/Web Development Solutions
Sun Microsystems
Phone: +1-650-786-8469
Fax: +1-650-786-3674




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Search: Match: Sort by:
Words: | Help


Powered by eList eXpress LLC