Re: POC Press event Ideas

[jacques durand <jacques@savvion.com>]

Hi Krishna:

Savvion has mentioned intention to participate since the very beginning,
so if there is a GCI track (as I thought there would be), we can also do it
(we had a very graphical "seller" GUI at Tokyo)
Now I understand the demo has to be much shorter - in which case we
might not be able to fit everyone. That's OK if we can still  show
the spectrum and presence of adopting vendors  in some other way.

Regards,

Jacques



Krishna Sankar wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>         Here is a preliminary POC plan for the press event. Please think thru and
> see if this is workable, fair and includes everybody who wants to
> participate.
>
>         Start with Nick's POC slides (Nick)
>         Go to the Architecture slide upto the point where the three transparent
> boxes appear showing the design, configuration and run time. (Mark)
>
>         Go directly to the TPA track - intro slide (Krishna)
>         TPA track sequence diagram (Krishna)
>         TPA Track topology
>                 Farrukh's GUI (Farrukh)
>                         Shows interoperable registry by Sun, XMLs and Sterling
>                 Mark's GUI (Mark) showing TPA formation
>                 Fujitsu-Netfish (showing TPA Proposal) (Iwasa,Sanjay)
>
>                 *********** Question : Do we have NetFish and Fujitsu participation to
> show this ?
>
>         Introduce AIAG track (Sid)
>         AIAG Track - Marketplace example
>
>                 IPNet - Viquity - IBM
>
>                 *********** Question : Does this make sense ? Can IPnet/Viquity/IBM work
> this out Or
>
>                                 Should we do the GCI track with IPNet-Viquity-IBM ?
>
>         end of demo
>
>                 *********** Did we leave out anybody ?
>
>         My approximation is this will take about 25 minutes.
>
>         Ed/Susy/Steve,
>
>         We need 20-25 minutes to show the breadth of vendor participation. I think
> it is Ok as we need to show that this is real and many companies *have*
> stuff working across their products.
>
>         If we have three screens as follows it would be good:
>
>         #1 projector with 4 or 8 monitor switch to show buyer side
>         #2 projector with 4 or 8 monitor switch to show seller/supplier side
>         #3 projector tied to one computer to show the slides
>
>         In Tokyo, we had two projectors and used one for the slides. So we switched
> between the buyer/seller with one projector
>
>         cheers