RE: Security Proposal

[Nicholas Kassem <Nick.Kassem@eng.sun.com>]

Dick,

The process is a bit more complicated than this. We need to go offline and 
talk about secret handshakes etc. ;-)
Seriously though - Krishna has it about right. The key point is that you 
don't have to do it all yourself. You can partner if you wish. You need to 
pick the sub-set of the overall scenario you care about most and help 
contribute to the overall message. Welcome aboard.

Regards,
Nick

At 07:26 PM 12/17/2000 -0800, Mark A. Hale wrote:
>Very well said Krishna.   Dick - we look forward to working with you.
>
>         Mark
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 7:21 PM
> > To: dick@8760.com; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > Subject: RE: Security Proposal
> >
> >
> > Dick,
> >
> >       Welcome to the POC ! Here is my take on the POC participation:
> >
> >       The participation is basically attending the weekly con calls (every
> > Thursday 9:00 PST), subscribing to the POC list, proposing POC
> > scenarios and
> > implementing some part of one or more proposals.
> >
> >       We are at the proposal stage with the final vote coming up
> > this Thursday.
> > You have a chance to propose a PGP based Security scenario (As
> > Vancouver is
> > more technological in nature, a technical security proposal is
> > fine), Hatem
> > from IPNet and Sid from Netfish are also interested in a security
> > proposal.
> >
> >       Once the proposals are voted in, each participant can offer
> > the roles and
> > capabilities they want to participate as and discuss during the f2f (to be
> > in SJ sometime in January). Then it is implement one's part, work with
> > others to integrate one's roles and off to the conference !
> >
> >       cheers
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 6:00 PM
> > > To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> > > Subject: RE: Security Proposal
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear POC'ers,
> > >
> > > If the POC used PGP there would be no need for a CA. The POC
> > participants
> > > would simply exchange public keys (which also cost $0, as
> > compared to PKI
> > > certificates). Would POC implementers be interested in using PGP
> > > for payload
> > > security (encryption/digital signature) during the POC?
> > >
> > > Also, Group 8760 may be interested in participating in the
> > Vancouver POC,
> > > what is the process for participating?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dick Brooks
> > > Group 8760
> > > 110 12th Street North
> > > Birmingham, AL 35203
> > > dick@8760.com
> > > 205-250-8053
> > > Fax: 205-250-8057
> > > http://www.8760.com/
> > >
> > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
> > >
> > >