[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Security Proposal
Hi, Like Bill & Lloyd, I am a new-comer too. I manage product development for Internet Commerce Systems, a b2b operating in the retail industry. Been following this WG for a couple of weeks now and would want to join the PoC and actively participate in the retail industry PoC. Got introduced to ebXML through UCC-net and would want contribute to the process. Could one of you forward the numbers for the conf call. ________________________________ Raghu Rajah Manager - Product Development Internet Commerce Systems, Inc. http://www.icsfoodone.com 770.662.8033 ext 119 Krishna Sankar To: Bill Dunigan <bdunigan@cyclonecommerce.com>, <ksankar@cisc ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org o.com> cc: Subject: RE: Security Proposal 12/21/00 10:47 AM Bill / Lloyd, Welcome to the POC team. I am sure you have the numbers for today's POC con call at 9:00 PST. cheers > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Dunigan [mailto:bdunigan@cyclonecommerce.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 6:19 AM > To: Krishna Sankar; dick@8760.com; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org > Subject: RE: Security Proposal > > > Hi, I'm Bill Dunigan, an Engineer from Cyclone Commerce. > Lloyd Kurth, Cyclone's Chief Architect, and I would like to join the POC > also. Since we are coming in so late, we'll try to listen and learn at > first but we do intend to actively participate. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Krishna Sankar [mailto:ksankar@cisco.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 8:21 PM > To: dick@8760.com; ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org > Subject: RE: Security Proposal > > > Dick, > > Welcome to the POC ! Here is my take on the POC participation: > > The participation is basically attending the weekly con calls (every > Thursday 9:00 PST), subscribing to the POC list, proposing POC > scenarios and > implementing some part of one or more proposals. > > We are at the proposal stage with the final vote coming up > this Thursday. > You have a chance to propose a PGP based Security scenario (As > Vancouver is > more technological in nature, a technical security proposal is > fine), Hatem > from IPNet and Sid from Netfish are also interested in a security > proposal. > > Once the proposals are voted in, each participant can offer > the roles and > capabilities they want to participate as and discuss during the f2f (to be > in SJ sometime in January). Then it is implement one's part, work with > others to integrate one's roles and off to the conference ! > > cheers > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] > > Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2000 6:00 PM > > To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org > > Subject: RE: Security Proposal > > > > > > Dear POC'ers, > > > > If the POC used PGP there would be no need for a CA. The POC > participants > > would simply exchange public keys (which also cost $0, as > compared to PKI > > certificates). Would POC implementers be interested in using PGP > > for payload > > security (encryption/digital signature) during the POC? > > > > Also, Group 8760 may be interested in participating in the > Vancouver POC, > > what is the process for participating? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dick Brooks > > Group 8760 > > 110 12th Street North > > Birmingham, AL 35203 > > dick@8760.com > > 205-250-8053 > > Fax: 205-250-8057 > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC