[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Minutes 21-Dec2000 POC Conf-call
Sorry for the delayed posting. Participants were: Sharad Agarwal Sid Askary Joseph Baran Jim Clark Philippe DeSmedt Bill Dunigan Jacques Durand Mark Hale Sigmund Handelman Michael Joya Ravi Krakar Dale Moberg Raghu Rajah Yoshi Russell Saikat Saha Krishna Sankar Stefan Schulz Prasad Yendluri Apologies if I missed (or misspelled) anyone. **NOTE** I received a few emails complaining of an inability to get on the call. Can we please expand the lines to 25 (usually, if they are not used there is no charge). We welcomed our new members: Commerce One, Cyclone, Internet Commerce Systems, Kildara, Update from STC and TRP: - Sid updated the team on the timeline discussions in STC and TRP regarding getting the TRP spec before the TRP f2f, so that there is time for comments. We need to provide TRP our feedback. Security: - Prasad raised the issue of interoperability with cpp without security and regrep. - Krishna commented that his efforts in the reg/rep are in line with the security-team's effort and they address a different area of application security altogether. - Sid raised the fact that too many flavors of security cause problems of interoperability during the upcoming POCs. - Philippe said that this is something that the TRP is leaving to the implementers. - Dale saw no issues with agreeing on one particular security implementation ahead of time. - Ravi, along with a few others, raised their concern that any options in the spec - in particular the variations in Security, become mandatory feature set provisions, which an ebXML vendor MUST implement. - Krishna, Sid, Dale and others who are interested will contact the security WG (not a separate side activity). proposals: - There are two proposals submitted by BP/CC and a third one from Dale. - Mark raised the issue that there does not seem to be a convergence on the proposals. The fact that the same group has put two different proposals forward is a concern. A better approach would have been to combine the two. - Jim Clark, a co-author on both proposals, said that one is an addendum to the other. This was done in the interest of time to meet the deadline for submission. The two would eventually be combined. - Mark and Sid also raised the issue of "Corporate Sponsors" as being inappropriate in the context of a POC proposal. There is a style that previous proposals have adhered to. - It appeared that the first BP/CC proposal would be more appropriate for London. For one thing, the Specs for BP/CC will be more advance. For another, the scenario covers an industry (Telecom) whose BP has a significant support in Europe. - Sig also mentioned that AIAG is interested in pursuing a Demo further, but the response from most of the participants was that AIAG was demonstrated in Tokyo and thus is not a suitable candidate for the upcoming POC effort. - Mark mentioned that He is trying to put together a discussion group focus on XML-One in London only. He will do that after the holidays. - Most participants felt that for Vancouver, we should focus on infrastructure issues. However, the notion of remote testing was brought up again. Michael Joya said that he could have a CA server ready very quickly, but that the overall requirements for a remote server with test harnesses was not clear. - We are going to take a look at Dale's proposal that was submitted late on that day to determine where we want to go. Most agree that a technically oriented POC with focus on security, R/R and CPP is the way to go for Vancouver. Agenda for next call on Jan 4th: - Do we have a winner (or a set of winners) for Vancouver? - State of conformance, remote testing. - Response to the TRP's latest specs. - A workable security model (al least for the TRP) implementation. - Where are we with regards to London? My thought is "let's not have yet another separate subgroup for our demos, security, etc., let's keep everything on the table". Happy New Year Sid Askary
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC