RE: Which version of the TRP spec

[Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>]

Krishna,
I have sensed that .91 has caused at least some controversy and I believe
it premature to
say "we should follow the 091x." at this moment.

Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
XML Industry Enablement
IBM e-business Standards Strategy
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074



Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com> on 01/09/2001 05:53:12 PM

To:   Eric Vickery <eric@8760.com>, ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
cc:
Subject:  RE: Which version of the TRP spec



Eric,

   We should follow the 0.91x. From what I gather, there should not be that
many changes to 0.91x. So if we start working with 0.91x and make the final
changes as soon as the f2f changes are in, we should be OK. 0.8x is an
older
version and so it is not a good practice to use it.

     Another major question is which version of the TPA (CPP/CPA) are we
going
to use. Again, we will have to use the version coming out in the next few
weeks.

     cheers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Vickery [mailto:eric@8760.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 2:57 PM
> To: ebxml-poc@lists.ebxml.org
> Subject: Which version of the TRP spec
>
>
> Group 8760 is working on an implementation for the next POC demo and I
was
> wondering which version of the TRP spec the POC will be using. There are
> significant changes in the spec between 0.8 and 0.91 and in the
> interest of
> interoperability I would assume that the group will agree to
> follow a single
> version of the spec for the demo.
>
> Thanks,
> Eric Vickery
> Group 8760, LLC
> 110 12th Street North
> Birmingham, AL 35203
> eric@8760.com
> 205-250-8053
> Fax 205-250-8057
> www.8760.com
>
> InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions
>
>