FW: Vienna POC demo - BP portion

[Philippe DeSmedt <PDeSmedt@viquity.com>]

All,

Please refer to the message that I just sent. The attached is an important
note from Karsten Riemer from the BP group. It affects participants who
dynamically access stored CPPs and/or CPAs.

-Philippe
_______________________________
Philippe De Smedt
Architect
Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com)
1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102
(408) 548-9722
(408) 747-5586 (fax)
pdesmedt@viquity.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Karsten Riemer [mailto:Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 11:17 AM
To: colm@bindsys.com
Cc: Karsten.Riemer@east.sun.com; LONJON Antoine; 'William Cox'; Brian
Hayes; Cory Casanave; Nita Sharma; Karsten Riemer; Sid Askary; Sigmund
Handelman; Philippe DeSmedt; Eckenfels. Bernd
Subject: RE: Vienna POC demo - BP portion


I strongly recommend that we use BPSS version 1.0.
That is currently posted as an appendix to the BPSS spec at ebxml.org.
I attach it here, as well.
I just talked to Kurt Kanaskie and he will send me a summary of the changes
.99 to 1.0 changes which I will forward to this distribution.

thanks,
-karsten


>
>Antoine,
>
>I made some changes to your Retail.xml file so that it would obey the ebXML
>BPSS 0.99 DTD. The new file is attached. Can someone pls confirm that the
>POC demo will be using 0.99 of the BPSS ?
>
>Look forward to meeting you all in Vienna.
>
>regards,
>
>Colm.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: LONJON Antoine [mailto:alonjon@mega.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 8:54 PM
>To: 'William Cox'; Colm Caffrey; Brian Hayes; Cory Casanave; Nita
>Sharma; LONJON Antoine; Karsten Riemer; Sid Askary; Sigmund Handelman;
>Philippe DeSmedt
>Cc: Eckenfels. Bernd
>Subject: RE: Vienna POC demo - BP portion
>
>
>William,
>
>Here is the second version proposed for the POC in Vienna.
>I have a first approach to reconcile the POC scenario and the worksheets
>from the business process analysis group.
>
>The POC scenario is presented in two ways. A end to end point of view and a
>collaboration point of view where the transaction definition layer is
added.
>The models coming from the for the retail sample worksheets are presented
>closely to UMM.
>I need to add the payload definition.
>
>The retail.xml file is the generated ebXML Collaboration file.
>
>I am also working on a first version of the HL7 scenario. I have reversed
>the DTD in UML.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: William Cox [mailto:William.Cox@bea.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:25 AM
>To: Colm Caffrey; Brian Hayes; Cory Casanave; Nita Sharma; LONJON
>Antoine; Karsten Riemer; Sid Askary; Sigmund Handelman; Philippe
>DeSmedt; William Cox
>Cc: Eckenfels. Bernd
>Subject: Re: Vienna POC demo - BP portion
>
>
>I don't know whether this got out; several people responded, but I'd like
to
>hear from Netfish, CommerceOne, and Sun on the BP group presentation/POC,
as
>well as fitting in with models of the POC interactions for the two demos
>planned for Vienna.
>
>Please acknowledge, even if you're not interested in participating.
>
>I'm planning on being on the BP call today, Monday 4/30.
>
>Thanks!
>
>bill
>
>BP coordination for Vienna POC
>--
>William Cox
>BEA Systems Architecture and Standards
>140 Allen Road             Liberty Corner NJ 07938
>+1 908 580 3458      fax +1 908 580 3060
>William.Cox@bea.com
>
>
>William Cox wrote:
>
>> All - -
>>
>> I'm sending this email to all of you about planning for the ebXML Proof
>> of Concept demo in Vienna next month. We hope that several of you can
>> show ebXML BP and/or CC technologies, in addition to a group
>> presentation by the BP team.
>>
>> There is a face-to-face meeting in Maryland next week, as well as
>> Monday/Tuesday of the ebXML meeting.  I'm hoping that your BP-related
>> efforts can be independently done, so fine tuning early in the meeting
>> week will be all that's necessary.
>>
>> The just-revised detailed planning document will be sent out tomorrow
>> morning (U.S. Eastern Daylight Time), but the BP-related portions are
>> not in place.  We will also send this document directly to you, as you
>> may not be closely monitoring the ebxml-poc list.
>>
>> There are two scenarios we will show:
>>      eBusiness with payment authority and a variety of payloads
>>      HL7/Healthcare scenario with HL7 payloads, hospital, lab, etc
>> There are interaction diagrams in the planning document, along with
>> drawings and descriptions. These are available as Rose models if that
>> might be useful to you (Sig?). We needed to nail down our scenarios,
>> which took longer than we had hoped.
>>
>> To summarize what I'd like to see in the demo:
>>
>> (1) At the start of the POC time, the Business Process Team will discuss
>> BP modeling and definition issues to set the scene (10 minutes or so)
>>
>> (2) For eBusiness:
>>      One participant shows a model (possibly tied into CPP/CPA
>> formation)
>>      Another participant shows a model (preferably of a different
>> portion)
>>      (one could show building a model, another modifying it to fit the
>> demo)
>>     This will be woven around the demonstration.
>>
>> (3) For HL7
>>      One or two participants as above.
>>
>> We hope that you will be able to participate.  Sid Askary is the one to
>> contact about ground rules and how to present; I'm the one to talk to
>> about details of the planning and the content.
>>
>> bill
>

XA.Document