RE: DSML

["Nieman, Scott" <Scott.Nieman@norstanconsulting.com>]

Yes, I read about DSML last week in a trade rag announcement.  Potentially
for the registry, not necessarily for the repository.  More than anything a
registry interchange syntax?.
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Van Noord [mailto:vannoord@trans4m.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 2:49 PM
To: Nieman, Scott
Cc: 'ebxml-regrep@lists.oasis-open.org '
Subject: Re: Business Requirements


We may want to look at DSML (or a subset) as one option for the repository.

http://www.dsml.org/

"Nieman, Scott" wrote:

> Yes!  Speaking of, here is an advanced copy of what will go into the next
> X12 DISAGRAM newsletter.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Allen
> To: ebxml-regrep@lists.oasis-open.org; Scott.Nieman@norstanconsulting.com
> Sent: 12/20/99 1:17 PM
> Subject: RE: Business Requirements
>
> I've had a look through the HTML+GIF rendering of the UML
> use cases, and I believe I understand what they represent.
> But I'd feel more comfortable with a prose intro.  So here's
> a start on a para - please correct me if I've misstated something.
>
> The diagram(s) {whatever their name or URI} show the
> actors who will access the registry and repository, their
> purposes, and their actions.  These actors are considered
> to be manipulating, storing, and retrieving standardized
> information or information that is in the process of
> standardization.
>
> [That is, the actors aren't storing instances of business
> documents, and the RA is seen as a standardizing body.]
>
> regards, Terry
>
> Terry Allen
> Advanced Technology Group
> Commerce One, Inc.
> Walnut Creek, Calif.
> tallen[at]sonic.net
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                     Name: DISAGRAM _PartII_workflow.doc
>    DISAGRAM _PartII_workflow.doc    Type: Winword File
(application/msword)
>                                 Encoding: base64