RE: I object to the objection over object -> RE: Proposal to reso lveinfo model issues

["Nieman, Scott" <Scott.Nieman@NorstanConsulting.com>]

It does have meaning to the registry, since everything in it is an object of
some form.  Is the alternative "thing"?  "Entry", to me, implies singular
but with proper description, I could be swayed.

I agree on the clock cycles, that is why I did not desire any changes.

the only thing about the proposed changes I like at this time are
ExtrinsicObject and IntrinsicObject.  Or ExtrinsicEntry and IntrinsicEntry??

Scott

<srh>If following the "everything" is an object as a baseline, 
(which I do not think this way in either programming or Architecture) 
then why would you agree to explicitly having an "object" class? On this 
one, 
I like Len's suggestion to change it to something that indicates a root 
that 
has some meaning to the Registry.