RE: Review of thoughts on Ad Hoc Queries

[Martin W Sachs <mwsachs@us.ibm.com>]

Scott,

I may have missed something along the way but I have no idea what is the
problem that TRP and TP are supposed to be solving.  Please elaborate.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



"Nieman, Scott" <Scott.Nieman@NorstanConsulting.com> on 01/09/2001 10:49:04
AM

To:   "'David RR Webber'" <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>
cc:   "''ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org ' '" <ebxml-regrep@lists.ebxml.org>
Subject:  RE: Review of thoughts on Ad Hoc Queries



>> Hey - one way to eliminate N - E is to make sure N will work
before you ask it!!

Now you are speaking my language!   BUT this is a problem, since TODAY we
have an implicit CPA versus an EXPLICIT CPA.  I would prefer an explicit
cpa, but I understood that this was going to be worked on by TRP.  The
interface discovery service in Part1 is all about explicit cpas, which
could
easily be something like WSDL (which currently has a binding to SOAP, not
dependent on SOAP, only a binding) or similiar.

If TRP and TP do not solve this, we may have to ourselves by release 2.

Scott