[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Query related comments (was RIM v0.54 distribution)
Farrukh, I will be address these issues tomorrow, however some immediate thoughts below. Thanks, DW. =========================================== Message text written by Farrukh Najmi > David, At the moment, I (and the query experts I have talked to) believe the approach that you have been advocating (also the NIST approach) as tantamount to rolling your own query syntax. Just because it is XML does not make it anything else. It is not based on any standard. It is not familiar to clients. And most of all it is difficult to spec. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how this opinion ever got started - but with the latest draft I have taken strenous efforts to show how this is simply NOT the case here - a XML container is clear not a query syntax. I assume that you will demonstrate how RIM based sample queries and their combinations will be represented in the approach you advocate soon. We need something analogous to the queries I published in both XPATH and OQL syntax. >>>>>>>>>>>>> On the one hand I'm hearing that we should explicitly NOT be developing any syntax specific methods - and on the other I'm hearing demands that methods should be supported with explicit code examples in XPath and OQL. It cannot be both at once! I will assume that something that demonstrates a generic API method - where the implementation query syntax is completely immaterial is what people are expecting to see. Lastly, we need a mind meld as a team on this issue soon since time is running out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scott has marked Friday for this. Thanks, DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC