Re: RS 0.84 distribution

[Yutaka Yoshida <Yutaka.Yoshida@eng.sun.com>]

Actually, I take it back. Because I heard the review is already
in progress, I thought we should wait for QR's comments before
doing this although the changes are not substantive.

yutaka yoshida

 > Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 13:03:06 -0800 (PST)
 > From: Yutaka Yoshida <Yutaka.Yoshida@eng.sun.com>
 > Subject: Re: RS 0.84 distribution
 > 
 > all,
 > 
 > As I haven't seen any objections to this version, I'm going to
 > send this to QR.
 > 
 > yutaka yoshida
 > Sun Microsystems
 > 
 >  > Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:04:17 -0500
 >  > From: Farrukh Najmi - JavaSoft East <Farrukh.Najmi@east.sun.com>
 >  > Subject: RS 0.84 distribution
 >  > 
 >  > Attached is the RS 0.84 document. Also attached is the same document with 
 > diffs turned on so you can see what has 
 >  > changed between 0.83 and 0.84. Since this has been a source of confusion 
for 
 > some recently, it should be noted that 
 >  > both attachments are 2 views of the same document (one without diffs and 
one 
 > with diffs).
 >  > 
 >  > The changes are as follows:
 >  > 
 >  > -Changes to address feedback from Nagwa (thanks Nagwa)
 >  > -Query BNF: Further simplifications to query syntax. There are no nested 
 > selects anymore. Thanks Mike Rowley for the suggestion.
 >  > -Semantic constraints added to simplify query syntax (e.g. Coolection 
 > attributes only legal in IN clause)
 >  > -Fixed minor typos in query examples (e.g. replaced double quotes with 
single 
 > quotes, added missing '(' and ')' in IN clauses). 
 >  >  These were caught when they were tested via cut-and-paste against a newly 
 > implemented query processor.
 >  > 
 >  > Per Klaus' recent note this is not an official submission to QRT. This 
does 
 > however represent the latest RS document
 >  > as far as the works of the Registry team are concerned. Scott or Yuta, you 
 > may submit this to StC if you see fit.
 >  > 
 >  > --
 >  > 
 >  > Regards,
 >  > Farrukh
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  >  
 >