Subject: MORE: Implicit CPP/CPA for Registry and Registry client
Message text written by Farrukh Najmi > I wanted to remind the team that I am working on an action item from our last meeting to re-introduce the implicit CPP/CPA for the registry and registry client. These were removed from the spec when we got woefully out of date with the TP teams specs. My action item is to bring them up-to-date with current TP and BP specs. So yes the registry will have an implicit template CPP in the spec defined in terms of the TP and BP specs as will the registry client. The two CPPs will be used in much the same way as 2 parties that wish to conduct eBuisness together. This has always been the intent of our specs. -- Regards, Farrukh< >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Farrukh, Great! I look forward to seeing your deliberations on this. This is a major NON-TRIVIAL piece to put in place. Having been down this road - I fully appreciate the amount of work it takes to trawl through the many and disparate pieces of the TRP and BP spec sections to get all the right answers. In some sense this is also a very important validation of those other spec's - that they can be used to succintly and clearly describe the registry services interfacing. This ain't easy - and perhaps we should have gotten to this sooner, but eh, 20:20 hindsight is easy! Thanks once again for your tireless efforts on these gnarly details. DW.
eList eXpress LLC