[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Requirements scope questions
Hi y'all, I have been reading the archives and everything else I could find and have some questions related to ebXML requirements scope. Please forgive me if I missed an answer to my questions, and point me in the right direction. I'll try to define four levels of scope. Feel free to correct my terminology or classification if you don't like my definitions, but I hope the basic idea will communicate anyway. Level 1: Transaction message format (the focus of EDIFACT and X12) There could also be a Level1.1 which abstracted the various duplicate and overlapping message formats for e.g. a Purchase. I understand this to be part of the scope of ebXML. Level 2: Transaction message sending and receiving protocol (I know ebXML at least wants to get this far) Level 3: Overall business transaction that the transaction message is part of. For example, for a purchase transaction, there may be: order confirmation shipping notice receipt invoice payment return etc eCo may cover this level under Choreography. Not sure if ebXML wants to go this far. Level 4: Value system that the business transaction is part of. For example, in a commercial product supply chain, many business transactions represent dependent demands for components and services related to the ultimate customer requirement. The dependent business transactions constitute a semantic web, where changes to one node may have ripply effects across large areas of the whole web. In my opinion, the real potential of the Internet is at level 4: the semantic Web for value systems. I also see efforts to implement this level going on right now - not standardized, of course. However, I understand that ebXML has deadlines, and I fully support piecemeal growth. So I am not attempting to expand the scope of the initial effort with these questions. The questions are: A. What is the intended scope of ebXML requirements, in relation to the levels I posed above, or some alternate definition of scope that would cover the same ideas? B. Assuming ebXML has an initial scope that does not extend to level 4 as defined above, do any members have any interest in a follow-on process to get there? Thanks very much, Bob Haugen Logistical Software LLC http://www.supplychainlinks.com (see White Papers for more discussion of standardized semantic Web for business)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC