[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: gap analysis
Responding to the F2F minutes, Marty wrote: > Tokyo item 3: My notes show that the gap analysis will be on tpaML vs the > XML representation of the business process metamodel. I understood that we were speaking about gap analysis vs. the UML, not XML, version of the BP metamodel. In any case, the team should compare tpaML with the UML version because (1) the UML version has fairly mature and stable semantics, and (2) we agreed that BP XML must have the same semantics, particularly choreography, as BP UML. Apart from having the same semantics as the UML version, it's still quite unclear what the XML version will be -- tomorrow the BP metamodel group will begin discussion of one new proposal. I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but as Karsten wrote in another note "This document is just one of several possible approaches. The metamodel group as such will determine whether to move forward with this approach or some other approach." Tony Weida Edifecs
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC