Subject: Re: Comments of CPP
Duane, Please see my reply to your later email on roles. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com> on 01/18/2001 06:54:03 PM To: ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org cc: Subject: Comments of CPP Hello Marty/all: In the CPP example, near the bottom of the XML Document, there is an element <CollaborationProtocol> that encapsulates each business process supported by the party ID'ed at the top of the CPP document. Each Business Process can have one, two or more roles defined. In some cases the roles may be identified by words such as "Buyer" and "Seller" (as per the example). Other more generic terms may be used as well such as "Submitter" or "Receiver". The <Roles> element near the top of the document defines a Party's ability to fulfill a certain role within a business process. Becuase Business Process's can be adopted from multiple sources (who each define their own semantics and Roles) I see a possible collision of names used to describe roles within different business processes. Is it possible to keep the existing <CollaborationProtocol> structure near the end of the CPP document however, place an element within it to allow the party to state which roles it supports. The element would have to be able to occur one or more times. eg> <CollaborationProtocol version = "1.0" id = "N07" xlink:type = "locator" xlink:href="http://www.foo.com/purchasing.xml"> Buy and Sell <!-- This role would be explicitly called out in the actual Business Process XML document--> <Role>Buyer</Role> <Role>Seller</Role><!--can receive the PO as well as send them out--> </CollaborationProtocol> Comments? Duane Nickull
Powered by
eList eXpress LLC