[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: syncReply element
I have appended an email from Chris containing the changes for synchronous replies. Please review and comment. Please give this review priority since we are running out of time to complete the next version. Chris, I have a couple of questions: What if that delivery channel is pointing to a transport that has no synchronous reply capability? Would you agree to a "SHALL" somewhere under the transport or transport protocol element stating: "If the value of the syncReplyMode attribute of the Characteristics element is other than "none", a transport protocol that supports synchronous relies (e.g. HTTP) SHALL be specfied." The last paragraph of the text suggests a dependence on ebXML messaging. I would like to rephrase it. Would you buy ths: The ebXML Message Service's syncReply attribute is set to a value of "true" whenever the syncReplyMode attribute has a value other than "None". Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* ---------------------- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 04/04/2001 10:35 AM --------------------------- christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> on 04/03/2001 06:06:48 PM To: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS cc: Chris Ferris <cferris@xroads.East.Sun.COM> Subject: Re: versioning the instance documents Marty, Yes, that's what I have. I hope to finish the xsd/dtd and samples shortly. I just got the ftp accounts settled, so I'll also post the XSD, DTD and samples to the web. Fot purposes of validation, this is necessary so that we don't need to distribute the XSD or DTD, but can reference it from a well known location (ebxml.org). I've also got the syncReply covered (attached .doc). Despite our discussion last week where we concluded that placing it on both the sending/receiving protocol element, I am now of the belief that DeliveryChannel (as was the previous discussion... see Prasad's various postings) is the correct place for this. As for Packaging, I'm having trouble still. My thoughts on this topic will follow. Cheers, Chris Martin W Sachs wrote: > > Chris, > > It's all pencilled in. > > I added the attribute as the first attribute in CPP and the second one > (i.e. right after id) in CPA. It's probably a good idea to put it into the > DTD and XSD in the same place. Or, if you already put into the XSD and DTD > differently, let me know and I will make the text and examples match (at > the moment it only requires a pencil eraser to fix it). > > Regards, > Marty > > ************************************************************************************* > > Martin W. Sachs > IBM T. J. Watson Research Center > P. O. B. 704 > Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 > 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 > Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM > Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com > ************************************************************************************* (See attached file: Characteristics element.doc) (See attached file: chris.ferris.vcf)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC