[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Is BP Specification Schema mandatory?
what you propose makes things clearer. thanks we shall discuss this at our call tomorrow and then get back to the BP Spec Schema team. christopher ferris wrote: > Tim, > > Please forward to ebxml-coord as I'm not subscribed. > > There is no restriction per se. A ProcessSpecification can point to > anything at all. It can even "point to" nothing at all as would > be the case where a URI/URN is used to identify an abstraction > that two or more Parties understand through some means other > than via a UML, XML or other document. > > Our specification has only dealt explicitly with the use > case in which the document referenced by the xlink:href attribute > of the ProcessSpecification element is an ebXML BPSS instance > document that describes a specific business process. > > Are you asking us to explicitly state/specify how the CPP/CPA > might be used with a busines process specification that is NOT > conformant > with the BPSS? > > Would the following be more acceptable: > > line 554 > "The ProcessSpecification element provides the reference to a process > specification > that defines the interactions between the two Parties. It is > RECOMMENDED that this reference be a document that is prepared in accord > with the ebXML > Business Process Specification Schema specification[BPMSPEC]. However, > it MAY reference > anything that the two Parties mutually recognize and understand. This > specification only concerns itself with a formal description of the > use case that the document referenced is prepared in accord with the > ebXML Business Process Specification Schema specification[BPMSPEC]." > > Cheers, > > Chris > Tim McGrath wrote: > > > > an issue has arisen in the Quality Reveiw of the Business Porcess Specification Schema. > > Their document states: > > > > "The CPA/CPP Specification requires that parties agree upon a Collaboration Protocol > > Agreement (CPA) in order to transact business. A CPA associates itself with a specific > > Binary Collaboration. Thus, all Business Transactions performed between two parties must > > be referenced through Business Transaction Activities contained within a Binary > > Collaboration. " (Business Process Specification Schema v0.99, lines 734-739) > > > > we queried this condition with the BP team and now accept that this is in line with the > > current CPP/CPA spec, that states: > > > > line 496 "The CollaborationRole element SHALL consist of the following child elements: a > > REQUIRED ProcessSpecification element, ..." > > > > and subsequently... > > > > line 554 "The ProcessSpecification element provides the link to the Process-Specification > > document that defines the interactions between the two Parties. This document is > > prepared in accord with the ebXML Business Process Specification Schema > > specification[BPMSPEC]." > > > > our concern is that this would prevent organisations not using business process models > > (in ebXML BPSS form) from using ebXML CPAs. we cannot see why this restriction is > > necessary. > > > > can you clarify the intention? > > > > -- > > regards > > tim mcgrath > > TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160 > > phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: email@example.com -- regards tim mcgrath TEDIS fremantle western australia 6160 phone: +618 93352228 fax: +618 93352142
Powered by eList eXpress LLC