Re: Please Respond: TP Sections in ebXML Requirements Spec 1.04

[Mike Rawlins <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com>]

Marty,

Thanks *very* much for the prompt response.  We'll be making the changes as you
suggested.

Mike

Martin W Sachs wrote:

> Mike,
>
> Formally speaking, it is always the Party that is discovered.  However, it
> might be worthwhile including the following sentence from the QR comment:
> "There can, and will be, multiple profiles for specific process, regions,
> buyers and
> systems throughout one organisation."  This could be added at the end of
> the paragraph in lines 839-845. I believe that the revised paragraph is in
> accord with what ebXML has done thus far.
>
> I lifted some words from the above QR comment to improve what the TP spec
> says in this area.
>
> There is also a broader issue that might best be left for after Vienna:  In
> watching the discussions about Regrep and its relation to UDDI, it has
> become clear to me that the CPP is probably not the primary object to be
> discovered.  Discovery is much more likely to occur through a yellow-pages
> function or similar taxonomy.  Once the Party is discovered through such a
> function, its CPPs would then be visible for use determing business-process
> and IT compatibility.  In short, the real statement about discovery should
> relate to the discovery functions provided by the Registry.
>
> Regards,
> Marty
>
> *************************************************************************************
>
> Martin W. Sachs
> IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
> P. O. B. 704
> Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
> 914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
> Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
> Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
> *************************************************************************************
>
> Mike Rawlins <mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com> on 04/27/2001 11:04:00 AM
>
> Please respond to mike@rawlinsecconsulting.com
>
> To:   ebxml-tp <ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org>
> cc:   Mark CRAWFORD <mcrawford@lmi.org>
> Subject:  Please Respond: TP Sections in ebXML Requirements Spec 1.04
>
> QRT offered the following comment regarding this specification, which is
> currently posted for public comment on the ebXML web site.
>
> Discovering a "party"
> Is it the "party" that is discovered (lines 839-842)? There can, and
> will be, multiple profiles for specific process, regions, buyers and
> systems throughout one organisation.
>
> Please assess this comment and provide us with any suggested wording
> changes by close of business, Thursday, April 27.  If no changes are
> offered, this section will remain as written in the final version and we
>
> will note in our comment disposition log that your team offered no
> changes.
>
> Thanks very much,
>
> ---------------------
> Mike Rawlins, ebXML Work Group, Requirements Project Team Leader
> http://www.ebxml.org/project_teams/requirements/private/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: ebxml-tp-request@lists.ebxml.org

--
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com