[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Explanations about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPASpecification V1.0
Yukinori, My responses to your questions are embedded below. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Yukinori Saito <y-saito@ecom.or.jp> on 05/16/2001 09:44:04 PM To: TP-Team <ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org> cc: "EDIgr)H.Sugamata" <sugamata@ecom.or.jp>, "EDIgr)K.Mizoguchi" <mizoguchi@ecom.or.jp>, "EDIgr)K.Wakaizumi" <waka@ecom.or.jp> Subject: Explanations about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPA Specification V1.0 I made brief explanation documents about examples of CPP/CPA based on CPP/CPA Specification V1.0. I revised some descriptions of explanation documents that were indicated in Vienna meeting. If anyone noticed some comments about these explanation documents, please let me know. Followings are my doubt about CPA example. (1)The contents of Service element of both companies are different each other. One (for buyer) is 'uri:example.com/services/buyerService' and the other one (for seller) is 'uri:example.com/services/sellerService'. Is this possible? MWS: The service element refers to the service facility of the party under which the service element list listed. The values of the service elements of the two parties may be the same or different. (2)Communication protocol of company '123456789' (buyer) is HTTP and SMTP. Communication protocol of company '987654321' (seller) is HTTP only. Is this correct? MWS: The CPA example in the published specification shows that the communication protocols of both parties are HTTP only. One party has transport N05, the other has transport N35. In the CPP, there is a transport N08 which has Receive HTTP and send SMTP but this is not used in the CPA. MWS: There is another problem in the CPA. One Override element references channeId="N08" and one DeliveryChannel element references transportId ="N08". Nothing in the CPA has an ID attribute with value "N08". In addition, the same ID attribute value cannot be used on two different elements. The parser should detect these errors. This will not be fixed now. It should be on the list for fixing later by the OASIS TC. Best Regards from Japan, Yukinori Saito -------------------------------------------------- Yukinori Saito Electronic Commerce Promotion Council of Japan(ECOM) E-mail:y-saito@ecom.or.jp TEL:+81-3-5500-3642 FAX:+81-3-5500-3660 --------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC