RE: Comment on the TRP overview and Requirements documents

[David Burdett <david.burdett@commerceone.com>]

>>>	A full specification of the ack responsibilities/assumptions of 
both sides is very important.<<<
I agreee.

>>>Words are nice, state diagrams are better.<<<
I also agree and would expect these to be covered in the specs we need to
produce on document exchange templates and reliable messaging.

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter D. Pruyne [mailto:pdp@mcs.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 9:54 PM
To: ebXML-Transport@lists. oasis-open. org
Subject: Re: Comment on the TRP overview and Requirements documents


> 2.  Message 4.2 1(b) states "failure to deliver a document should be
> notified to the party that sent the document"
> 
> I agree, however,  in the case where the document could not be parsed
> (specifically the return address in the header) is this possible?
> 
> Maybe the methodoloy should be that a message that is not acknowledged
> should be considered not delivered.  The use models for business may be
> stricter than that with email, http etc.
> 

	A full specification of the ack responsibilities/assumptions of 
both sides is very important.  Words are nice, state diagrams are 
better.


PDP