RE: Comment on the TRP overview and Requirements documents

["Peter D. Pruyne" <pdp@mcs.net>]

> >>>	A full specification of the ack responsibilities/assumptions of 
> both sides is very important.<<<
> I agreee.
> 
> >>>Words are nice, state diagrams are better.<<<
> I also agree and would expect these to be covered in the specs we need to
> produce on document exchange templates and reliable messaging.
> 

	We might need a few of these, that reflect the spectrum range 
of interactive to batch.  I think the process notions on these 
extremes would not likely be met well by a single approach.  But a 
small finite number would be usefull.  I would prefer named models.


PDP