[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re[2]: Concern with basic ebXML TRPSyntax/Semantics] (I'm Away)
Hi, I'm currently abroad, but will return on Sunday, April 16th. Thanks, and have a nice day, Michael Shalev Director of Development iDap Ltd. >>> ebXML-Transport 04/13/00 19:28 >>> I agree. XML DSig just came out of last call if I'm not mistaken. However, we also need to be mindful that there would need to be implementation(s) of this available. It may be that we'll need to support PGP or S/MIME for some period of time to allow for implementations to catch up with the W3C recommendation. Cheers, Chris "Kit (Christopher) Lueder" wrote: > I think the obvious answer is that W3C is developing an XML Signature > specification, and we defer finalization of an ebXML signature solution > until that is finalized. It would be unfortunate for the ebXML signature > solution (i.e., based on PGP or S/MIME) to be different with and > incompatible with the W3C signature solution. > Kit. > > dick@8760.com wrote: > > Bob, > > > > Please provide details showing how a PGP or S/MIME signed/encrypted payload is > > supported in your proposal. > > Dick Brooks > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Miller, Robert (GEIS) <Robert.Miller@geis.ge.com> > > To: <ebXML-Transport@lists.oasis-open.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 8:39 AM > > Subject: RE: [Fwd: Re[2]: Concern with basic ebXML TRP Syntax/Semantics] > > > > > Gentle People, > > > > > > Could we get to a single XML document with reasonably small risk of XML > > > parser failures beyond the ebXML header if we defined something like: > > > > > > <!ELEMENT ebXML (ebXMLHeader,ebXMLbody*)> > > > <!ELEMENT ebXMLHeader ( ... )> > > > <!ELEMENT ebXMLBody ANY> > > > > > > or for the 'body' parser, > > > > > > <!ELEMENT ebXML (ebXMLHeader,ebXMLbody*)> > > > <!ELEMENT ebXMLHeader ANY> > > > <!ELEMENT ebXMLBody ( ... )> > > > > > > Or perhaps the <ebXML> element could invoke some sort of XSLT filter that > > > blew apart the document into standalone header and body XML files and > > > invoked processing of the parts. (NOTE: I'm not an XML guru, so I might > > > just be blowing smoke here!) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Bob > > -- > _/ _/ Kit C. J. Lueder > _/ _/ _/ The MITRE Corp. Tel: 703-883-5205 > _/_/_/ _/ _/_/_/ 1820 Dolley Madison Bl Cell: 703-577-2463 > _/ _/ _/ _/ Mailstop W722 FAX: 703-883-7996 > _/ _/ _/ _/ McLean, VA 22102 Mail: kit@mitre.org > Worse than an unanswered question is an unquestioned answer.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC