[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: BusinessServiceInterface or ServiceInterface
What we could also do is say that a BusinessServiceInterface is a subclass or subtype of a mor general ServiceInterface. We could then allow the TRP specs to be more generally applicable whilst still supporting the needs of ebXML specifically. David -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:chris.ferris@east.sun.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 3:39 PM To: ebxml transport Subject: BusinessServiceInterface or ServiceInterface you make the call. I'd like to get a consensus on the name of what is now labeled as the BusinessServiceInterface element of the ebXMLHeader. David has raised the point that BusinessServiceInterface may be placing unnecessary consraint on its intended meaning, thinking that there might be 'technical' ServiceInterfaces, etc. I tend to agree that ServiceInterface might be more appropriate. However, BPWG has named this class in their BP metamodel BusinessServiceInterface. I have suggested that they rename it. Are there any objections to renaming this element? Comments? Chris -- _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063 _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Email: chris.ferris@East.Sun.COM _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ Sun Microsystems, Mailstop: UBUR03-313 _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC