Re: Trading Partner or Party - What's in a name

["Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III" <winchel@mindspring.com>]

Another small point/correction . . .

In my email, I wrote "this is how we solved the problem" . . . by that I
don't mean this is a perfect, or even good, solution or that it is a
solution you should adopt, but more . . . "this is what we did  . . . hope
it helps."

That having been said, everyone has to deal with names, addresses, and other
similar content models (and even "envelopes").  To the extent
cross-pollination can bring about standards, that would be great too.

Thanks,

Todd

----- Original Message -----
From: "David RR Webber" <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>
To: "Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III" <winchel@mindspring.com>
Cc: <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>; <david.burdett@commerceone.com>;
<sfuger@AIAG.ORG>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Trading Partner or Party - What's in a name


Message text written by "Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III"
>
<!ELEMENT Person (FullName, Salutation?, FirstName?, MiddleName?, LastName,
Suffix?, Designation?, NameAlias*)>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

As a pedantic note - since lawyers are quintessentially such: this should
be:

<!ELEMENT Person (FullName, Salutation?, FirstName?, MiddleName*, LastName,
Suffix?, Designation?, NameAlias*)>

Since people can have none, one, or more than one middlenames.

DW.