RE: RM Group Definitions

[richard drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

i don't see grouping messages as being a key point of a reliable messaging
spec. yes it is important for performance... but not for reliable messaging.
that is why i think we should forgo it on this round and concentrate on the
rm part of things.... best regards, rik

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Hughes [mailto:jfh@fs.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 3:41 AM
To: ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: RE: RM Group Definitions


Then we need to come to a quick resolution on this point in the group. If
message grouping (by this I mean sending only one MSH-level ACK for a group
of reliable messages) is not allowed, then it greatly simplifies the RM
spec... I suggest we carefully consider this before taking the decision for
this level of simplicity may yield an unacceptable solution.

Jim

At 03:47 PM 8/28/2000 -0500, richard drummond wrote:
>i don't think grouping is appropriate at this time. we need to keep it
>simple for the first round of ebxml... that is that though the end of may
>next year..... rik