RE: confusion on where to discuss trading partners

[David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Rik,

We're agreeing to disagree here!

I'm working on a draft for the RegRep side and QoS there.
RegRep has not addressed QoS on their side yet.

This is the crux.  Once I have this done I'm seeing we can
visit on this between the two groups and figure out the
interface layering.

The biggest problem here is impact analysis.  Just what
impact will one approach have compared to another approach
and where does that impact manifest itself?

UML diagrams were not designed to answer these sort of 
questions necessarily!

Anyway - I'm looking for a software engineering solution here
that hits the 'sweet spot' under the curve of optimal functionality
with minimal overhead.

What we have done (on this list over the last two weeks)
is identify all the parameters.   Anyway - I'll tackle this after next 
week and we can discuss further after that once we have an actual
draft to review.

At least we can agree on the KISS side - but not at the expense
of core business functional processing....too much KISS can be 
bad too.

Thanks, DW.
======================================================
Message text written by richard drummond
> 
no david not necessarily... rik

-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 9:23 AM
To: richard drummond
Cc: Christopher Ferris; ebxml-tp@lists.ebxml.org;
ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org; David Burdett
Subject: RE: confusion on where to discuss trading partners


Message text written by richard drummond
>so that this will work without one if necessary for the
start up mode and for very small organizations.... rik<

>>>>>>>>>>>

Not without one, but with a very simple default one, there's a 
big difference.  eg. default TPA for an AOL based business.

You do need to know this stuff - but the solution here is to
make it simple to do - not to negate the need.

DW.
 

<