Re: ralph, martha and ian, when will may we expect the ms spec to beinthe ietf like format?

[maw2@daimlerchrysler.com]

Ralph, I think we are on the same page.

Martha




Ralph Berwanger <rab7067@earthlink.net> on 08/30/2000 08:15:13 AM

To:   "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>
cc:

Subject:  Re: ralph, martha and ian, when will may we expect the ms spec to
      bein the ietf like format?


I thougth that we agreed NOT to use the IETF format.  I remember telling
the
group in San Jose that the transformation from the current format to the
one
provided was not a simple cut and paste.  It was a formal re-write of the
document.  I would propose that we get the current document approved and
then change the format with the next version.  I understand that this will
complicate the review of the next version; however, it will not delay the
publication of the work that we now have.

Ralph Berwanger

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Burdett" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
To: "'richard drummond'" <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>; "ebXML Transport
(E-mail)"
<ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: ralph, martha and ian, when will may we expect the ms spec to
bein the ietf like format?


> Folks
>
> I think that:
> a) we make the changes to the existing spec that we are identifiying on
the
> change list and only then
> b) rework to an IETF like format.
>
> Otherwise identifying what needs to be changed will be very difficult to
do.
>
> Anyone disagree?
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: richard drummond [mailto:rvd2@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 7:03 AM
> To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
> Subject: ralph, martha and ian, when will may we expect the ms spec to
> be in the ietf like format?
>
>
>