RE: [Fwd: RE: on the issue of PartyId]

[David RR Webber <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM
>My hangup is basically not to insist it
must
be a URI, and allow the application to alternately decide both the value
and the qualifier.
I'm more interested in getting agreement on this, before discussing the
registry point.<

Scott,

OK - I was almost confused there!  

I see where you are at on this - but still think this is a chicken and egg.

I agree with the approach though - I want the flexibility you are wanting,

then its just down to the actual implementation specifics to
accomplish that.

Thanks, DW.