RE: Explicit & Implicit acknowledgements

[Rik Drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

david, i think it would be good to discuss this on the conference call next
week to make sure those who were not there really  understand it... i know
you have described a real world problem.... but i am not sure yet of the
solution.  lets get everyone up to speed.. take some time to discuss it next
week.... best regards, rik

-----Original Message-----
From: Burdett, David [mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 8:02 PM
To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
Subject: Explicit & Implicit acknowledgements


Folks

I attach a presentation that most of you in Dallas this week have seen all
or part of. It describes how you can acknowledge receipt of messages
"implicitly.

I also think that, when using HTTP, we can always send back an explicit ack
on the HTTP response and we don't need to do this with a separate HTTP post.


So using the principle that we should not have two ways of doing something
when one will do, I suggest that we adopt this approach unless someone can
come up with reasons why it won't work.

David
 <<Alternative protocol bindings.ppt>>

Product Management, CommerceOne
4400 Rosewood Drive 3rd Fl, Bldg 4, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599
mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com