[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content length
Chris, I'm going to write-up some guidelines for calculating content-length for the MS spec . I hope to distribute this information by Monday, 10/9. Regards, Dick Brooks http://www.8760.com/ ----- Original Message ----- From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> To: Philippe DeSmedt <PDeSmedt@viquity.com> Cc: <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 7:47 AM Subject: Re: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content length > List-Unsubscribe: > <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=unsubscribe> > List-Archive: <http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-transport> > List-Help: <http://lists.ebxml.org/doc/email-manage.html>, > <mailto:ebxml-transport-request@lists.ebxml.org?body=help> > > Thanks guys! > > Philippe DeSmedt wrote: > > > > All, > > > > At the Dallas ebXML TR&P face-to-face, there was an action item to precisely > > define content-length in MIME, and I was asked to check with Dick Brooks on > > this. Below is the exchange. If you start reading from the bottom, and take > > into account the subsequent comments, I believe you'll be able to figure it > > out :) . Any volunteers to update the spec accordingly? > > > > -Philippe > > _______________________________ > > Philippe De Smedt > > Architect > > Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com) > > 1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue > > Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102 > > (408) 548-9722 > > (408) 747-5586 (fax) > > pdesmedt@viquity.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rik Drummond [mailto:rvd2@worldnet.att.net] > > Sent: Monday, October 02, 2000 5:45 AM > > To: Philippe DeSmedt > > Subject: FW: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content > > length > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 8:05 PM > > To: Rik Drummond > > Subject: RE: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content > > length > > > > Agree. > > > > Dick Brooks > > Group 8760 > > 110 12th Street North > > Birmingham, AL 35203 > > dick@8760.com > > 205-250-8053 > > Fax: 205-250-8057 > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rik Drummond [mailto:rvd2@worldnet.att.net] > > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 7:38 PM > > > To: Dick Brooks > > > Subject: RE: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content > > > length > > > > > > > > > i think the only way to interpret a boundary is crlf -- s;sdfdjfjd-- crlf > > > > > > not just the end... that is because a blank line followed by a > > > --.s.jfdj is > > > a boundary... rik > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] > > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 7:08 PM > > > To: Rik Drummond; Philippe DeSmedt > > > Subject: RE: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content > > > length > > > > > > > > > Rik, you meant END with a CRLF, right? > > > > > > Dick Brooks > > > Group 8760 > > > 110 12th Street North > > > Birmingham, AL 35203 > > > dick@8760.com > > > 205-250-8053 > > > Fax: 205-250-8057 > > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Rik Drummond [mailto:rvd2@worldnet.att.net] > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 7:02 PM > > > > To: Dick Brooks; Philippe DeSmedt > > > > Subject: RE: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content > > > > length > > > > > > > > > > > > i think it should say all lines start with crlf, even the last > > > > boundery.... > > > > rik > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 4:57 PM > > > > To: dick@8760.com; Philippe DeSmedt > > > > Cc: 'Rik Drummond' > > > > Subject: CORRECTION - RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content length > > > > > > > > > > > > The statement " (assume all lines end with CRLF except the last > > > > boundary):" > > > > SHOULD HAVE READ > > > > " (assume all lines end with CRLF including the last boundary):" > > > > > > > > Dick Brooks > > > > Group 8760 > > > > 110 12th Street North > > > > Birmingham, AL 35203 > > > > dick@8760.com > > > > 205-250-8053 > > > > Fax: 205-250-8057 > > > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > > > > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Dick Brooks [mailto:dick@8760.com] > > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2000 4:31 PM > > > > > To: Philippe DeSmedt > > > > > Cc: 'Rik Drummond'; Dick Brooks > > > > > Subject: RE: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content length > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Philippe, > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the kind words, I too enjoy getting together with > > > you and the > > > > > others. We are very fortunate to have such a highly functional team of > > > > > people in TRP. The key, I believe, is our ability to work and > > > > > play together; > > > > > this makes it enjoyable. > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully I can clear up the confusion over content-length, so > > > > here goes: > > > > > > > > > > Content-length has one meaning: the number of OCTETS of > > > "actual payload > > > > > data" within a message body or body part. The HTTP spec (RFC > > > > > 2616) states it > > > > > as follows: > > > > > "When a Content-Length is given in a message where a > > > message-body is > > > > > allowed, its field value MUST exactly match the number of OCTETs in > > > > > the message-body. HTTP/1.1 user agents MUST notify the user when an > > > > > invalid length is received and detected." > > > > > > > > > > Content-length is fairly straight forward to calculate at the message > > > > > envelope level, it should equal the total number of octets > > > > > starting with the > > > > > first character of the body through the last character of the > > > body, for > > > > > example: > > > > > > > > > > Content-length: 3 > > > > > Content-type: text/plain > > > > > > > > > > 123 > > > > > > > > > > (note there is no CRLF after 123, if there had been the > > > > > content-length would > > > > > have been 5). The blank line after the MIME headers is > > > > considered part of > > > > > the headers and is not included in the calculation of content-length. > > > > > > > > > > Things can get a bit tricky when you're dealing with multipart's and > > > > > boundaries. When calculating the content-length for the message > > > > > envelope you > > > > > must include all body parts and boundaries in the calculation, > > > > for example > > > > > (assume all lines end with CRLF except the last boundary): > > > > > > > > > > Content-length: 129 > > > > > Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="XXX" > > > > > > > > > > --XXX > > > > > Content-length: 3 > > > > > Content-type: text/plain > > > > > > > > > > 123 > > > > > --XXX > > > > > Content-length: 5 > > > > > Content-type: text/plain > > > > > > > > > > 456 > > > > > > > > > > --XXX-- > > > > > > > > > > The 129 content-length breaks out as follows (calculation > > > > includes CRLF at > > > > > the end of lines): > > > > > > > > > > 7 octets for the first boundary string > > > > > 19 octets for the Content-length header of the first body part > > > > > 26 octets for Content-type > > > > > 2 octets for CRLF blank line > > > > > 3 octets of actual payload > > > > > 9 octets for the boundary between body part 1 and 2 > > > > > 19 octets for the Content-length header of the second body part > > > > > 26 octets for Content-type > > > > > 5 octets of actual payload ((note inclusion of a CRLF this time) > > > > > 13 octets for the ending boundary > > > > > > > > > > Notice once again the blank line following the multipart/related > > > > > MIME header > > > > > is not counted as part of the content-length because it's > > > > > considered part of > > > > > the MIME headers. > > > > > ---------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > There are a couple of fundamental "rules" to consider when > > > dealing with > > > > > multipart's (ref RFC 2046): > > > > > > > > > > - The boundary delimiter line is defined as a line > > > > > consisting entirely of two hyphen characters ("-", decimal > > > value 45) > > > > > followed by the boundary parameter value from the > > > Content-Type header > > > > > field, optional linear white space, and a terminating CRLF. > > > > > > > > > > - The boundary delimiter MUST NOT appear inside any of the > > > encapsulated > > > > > parts, on a > > > > > line by itself or as the prefix of any line. > > > > > Said another way, boundaries must appear at the beginning of > > > > a line and > > > > > the pattern MUST NOT appear in the content of a > > > > > body part. > > > > > > > > > > - The boundary delimiter MUST occur at the beginning of a line, i.e., > > > > > following a CRLF, and the initial CRLF is considered to be attached > > > > > to the boundary delimiter line rather than part of the preceding > > > > > part. The boundary may be followed by zero or more characters of > > > > > linear white space. It is then terminated by either > > > another CRLF and > > > > > the header fields for the next part, or by two CRLFs, in which case > > > > > there are no header fields for the next part. If no Content-Type > > > > > field is present it is assumed to be "message/rfc822" in a > > > > > "multipart/digest" and "text/plain" otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > NOTE: The CRLF preceding the boundary delimiter line is > > > conceptually > > > > > attached to the boundary so that it is possible to have a part that > > > > > does not end with a CRLF (line break). Body parts that must be > > > > > considered to end with line breaks, therefore, must have two CRLFs > > > > > preceding the boundary delimiter line, the first of which > > > is part of > > > > > the preceding body part, and the second of which is part of the > > > > > encapsulation boundary. > > > > > > > > > > The boundary delimiter line following the last body part is a > > > > > distinguished delimiter that indicates that no further body parts > > > > > will follow. Such a delimiter line is identical to the previous > > > > > delimiter lines, with the addition of two more hyphens after the > > > > > boundary parameter value. > > > > > > > > > > --gc0pJq0M:08jU534c0p-- > > > > > > > > > > NOTE TO IMPLEMENTORS: Boundary string comparisons must compare the > > > > > boundary value with the beginning of each candidate line. An exact > > > > > match of the entire candidate line is not required; it is > > > sufficient > > > > > that the boundary appear in its entirety following the CRLF. > > > > > > > > > > I hope this helped. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dick Brooks > > > > > Group 8760 > > > > > 110 12th Street North > > > > > Birmingham, AL 35203 > > > > > dick@8760.com > > > > > 205-250-8053 > > > > > Fax: 205-250-8057 > > > > > http://www.8760.com/ > > > > > > > > > > InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Philippe DeSmedt [mailto:PDeSmedt@viquity.com] > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 6:29 PM > > > > > > To: 'dick@8760.com' > > > > > > Cc: 'Rik Drummond' > > > > > > Subject: ebXML TR&P: question re. MIME content length > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dick, > > > > > > > > > > > > Good seeing you again at the face-to-face. Have a fun and > > > > > > productive time at > > > > > > ecWorld. > > > > > > > > > > > > After you left, an issue that was discussed is that of > > > > content length in > > > > > > MIME (section 7.2.2, page 11, in the ebXML TR&P messaging > > > > document). It > > > > > > caused a lot of grief at the San Jose ebXML PoC, mostly due to > > > > > > the fact that > > > > > > there appears to be no clear and definitive specification as > > > > to what the > > > > > > content length applies to (i.e., how it is measured -- where it > > > > > starts and > > > > > > where it ends). We're hoping that you can shed some light on > > > > this murky > > > > > > issue. Thanks much. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Philippe > > > > > > _______________________________ > > > > > > Philippe De Smedt > > > > > > Architect > > > > > > Viquity Corporation (www.viquity.com) > > > > > > 1161 N. Fair Oaks Avenue > > > > > > Sunnyvale, CA 94089-2102 > > > > > > (408) 548-9722 > > > > > > (408) 747-5586 (fax) > > > > > > pdesmedt@viquity.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Christopher Ferris - Enterprise Architect > _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ Phone: 781-442-3063 or x23063 > _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ Email: chris.ferris@East.Sun.COM > _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ Sun Microsystems, Mailstop: UBUR03-313 > _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803-0903
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC