RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

reply:
OAG has already discussed the notion of adopting the ebXML Messaging
Framework and specifications when they are completed. It may make sense to
take the time to compare them anyway?
Joel


-----Original Message-----
From: yanqin xu [mailto:xuzenu@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 7:41 AM
To: david.burdett@commerceone.com; ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping


Hi, David,

I think there are three more needed to consider:
[1] CXML
[2] In the document content level, OAG. Maybe this work should belong to CC 
or CCBP group?
[3] In the document content level, OASIS Catalog and EBXML Catalog. Maybe 
this work should belong to CC or CCBP too?

I can do the comparison work between EBXML and CXML, and between EBXML and 
OAG if nobody else likes to do it. But I don't know anything about OASIS 
Catalog.

By the way, what is the time frame to finish the work?

Thanks.

Regards,

Jenny Xu
Standard Architect



>From: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
>To: "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>
>Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping
>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:58:22 -0800
>
>So to summarise, the following have "volunteered" to do standards mappings
>on the following protocols:
>* BizTalk 2.0 - Shawn Suzik
>* EDIINT AS2 - Dick Brooks
>* ICE - Eric Leckner
>* RosettaNet 2.0 - Krishna Sankar
>
>If there are any more please send an email to the list. What I propose is:
>1. We wait to Monday next to see if there are any more standards ... and/or
>volunteers ;)
>2. I will produce an Excel spreadsheet of the current elements/attributes 
>in
>ebXML so that we all use the same starting point
>3.  Where (if) there is more than one volunteer, the people involved agree
>between themselves how they will work together
>
>Regards
>
>David
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Burdett, David
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 6:26 PM
>To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
>Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping
>
>
>In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it would be a good
>idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8) with other
>similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial shortlist of 
>standards
>were:
>*	BizTalk version 2.0
>*	RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0
>
>Do we need to compare any others?
>
>Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and:
>*	mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8
>*	identifying data or elements that are missing and,
>*	making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional
>data or changes should be made to ebXML
>
>Now for the hard part !!
>
>To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the standard well.
>I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a volunteer for RNIF
>2.0.
>
>If you think that some other standard needs to be compared then please be
>prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or volunteer someone
>else ;)
>
>Regards
>
>David
>
>Product Management, CommerceOne
>4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
>Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599
>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.