RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping

[Rik Drummond <rvd2@worldnet.att.net>]

why are we doing this when we have limited person-power to even complete the
mhs spec in time?  rik

-----Original Message-----
From: yanqin xu [mailto:xuzenu@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:41 AM
To: david.burdett@commerceone.com; ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping


Hi, David,

I think there are three more needed to consider:
[1] CXML
[2] In the document content level, OAG. Maybe this work should belong to CC
or CCBP group?
[3] In the document content level, OASIS Catalog and EBXML Catalog. Maybe
this work should belong to CC or CCBP too?

I can do the comparison work between EBXML and CXML, and between EBXML and
OAG if nobody else likes to do it. But I don't know anything about OASIS
Catalog.

By the way, what is the time frame to finish the work?

Thanks.

Regards,

Jenny Xu
Standard Architect



>From: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>
>To: "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org>
>Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping
>Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:58:22 -0800
>
>So to summarise, the following have "volunteered" to do standards mappings
>on the following protocols:
>* BizTalk 2.0 - Shawn Suzik
>* EDIINT AS2 - Dick Brooks
>* ICE - Eric Leckner
>* RosettaNet 2.0 - Krishna Sankar
>
>If there are any more please send an email to the list. What I propose is:
>1. We wait to Monday next to see if there are any more standards ... and/or
>volunteers ;)
>2. I will produce an Excel spreadsheet of the current elements/attributes
>in
>ebXML so that we all use the same starting point
>3.  Where (if) there is more than one volunteer, the people involved agree
>between themselves how they will work together
>
>Regards
>
>David
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Burdett, David
>Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 6:26 PM
>To: ebXML Transport (E-mail)
>Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping
>
>
>In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it would be a good
>idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8) with other
>similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial shortlist of
>standards
>were:
>*	BizTalk version 2.0
>*	RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0
>
>Do we need to compare any others?
>
>Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and:
>*	mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8
>*	identifying data or elements that are missing and,
>*	making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional
>data or changes should be made to ebXML
>
>Now for the hard part !!
>
>To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the standard well.
>I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a volunteer for RNIF
>2.0.
>
>If you think that some other standard needs to be compared then please be
>prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or volunteer someone
>else ;)
>
>Regards
>
>David
>
>Product Management, CommerceOne
>4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
>Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599
>mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.