[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping
why are we doing this when we have limited person-power to even complete the mhs spec in time? rik -----Original Message----- From: yanqin xu [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:41 AM To: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping Hi, David, I think there are three more needed to consider:  CXML  In the document content level, OAG. Maybe this work should belong to CC or CCBP group?  In the document content level, OASIS Catalog and EBXML Catalog. Maybe this work should belong to CC or CCBP too? I can do the comparison work between EBXML and CXML, and between EBXML and OAG if nobody else likes to do it. But I don't know anything about OASIS Catalog. By the way, what is the time frame to finish the work? Thanks. Regards, Jenny Xu Standard Architect >From: "Burdett, David" <firstname.lastname@example.org> >To: "ebXML Transport (E-mail)" <email@example.com> >Subject: RE: Volunteers required for standards mapping >Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 12:58:22 -0800 > >So to summarise, the following have "volunteered" to do standards mappings >on the following protocols: >* BizTalk 2.0 - Shawn Suzik >* EDIINT AS2 - Dick Brooks >* ICE - Eric Leckner >* RosettaNet 2.0 - Krishna Sankar > >If there are any more please send an email to the list. What I propose is: >1. We wait to Monday next to see if there are any more standards ... and/or >volunteers ;) >2. I will produce an Excel spreadsheet of the current elements/attributes >in >ebXML so that we all use the same starting point >3. Where (if) there is more than one volunteer, the people involved agree >between themselves how they will work together > >Regards > >David > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Burdett, David >Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 6:26 PM >To: ebXML Transport (E-mail) >Subject: Volunteers required for standards mapping > > >In the conference call this morning it was agreed that it would be a good >idea to start comparing the current version of the spec (0.8) with other >similar standards to identify the "gaps". The initial shortlist of >standards >were: >* BizTalk version 2.0 >* RosettaNet Implementation Framework (RNIF) version 2.0 > >Do we need to compare any others? > >Comparison involves reviewing these standards headers and: >* mapping the header elements to ebXML version 0.8 >* identifying data or elements that are missing and, >* making a provisional recommendation on whether or not additional >data or changes should be made to ebXML > >Now for the hard part !! > >To do the comparison effectively needs someone who knows the standard well. >I am volunteering to do BizTalk, so that means we need a volunteer for RNIF >2.0. > >If you think that some other standard needs to be compared then please be >prepared to volunteer yourself to do the comparison or volunteer someone >else ;) > >Regards > >David > >Product Management, CommerceOne >4400 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA >Tel: +1 (925) 520 4422 (also voicemail); Pager: +1 (888) 936 9599 >mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org; Web: http://www.commerceone.com _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
Powered by eList eXpress LLC