Re: Test Indicator Issue

[Scott Hinkelman <srh@us.ibm.com>]

Something to keep in mind:
If it is elected to be dropped, then some verticals that use such a thing
(regardless of
their intended use) will have to accommodate it regardless, and will its
absence
be viewed as a shortcoming? One option is to include it,
with semantics to be used as seen fit.......

Scott Hinkelman, Senior Software Engineer
XML Industry Enablement
IBM e-business Standards Strategy
512-823-8097 (TL 793-8097) (Cell: 512-940-0519)
srh@us.ibm.com, Fax: 512-838-1074



christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com> on 11/30/2000 01:35:58 PM

To:   Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
cc:   ebxml-transport@lists.ebxml.org
Subject:  Re: Test Indicator Issue



Prasad,

Thanks for the feedback. It hasn't been voted up or
down yet. I will be sending out two proposals for a vote
via the list shortly.

Cheers,

Chris

Prasad Yendluri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a little late jumping onto this thread but, here is my two cents on
this:
>
> In my experience people have used this flag (say in RosettaNet) to test
their production
> sites prior to going "live". Having the test indicator in the actual
message (header),
> that is transferred alleviates any legal binding of such test messages.
>
> If this is already voted down please ignore.
>
> Thanks, Prasad